MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
77,547 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Dampness around steering rack
Front anti-roll bar corroded
Front number plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread
Front tyre valves age cracking
Oil leaks
Rear wheel arches corroding
Nearside Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
Nearside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Offside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
rear brake application uneven (3.7.B.2)
Dampness around steering rack
Front anti-roll bar corroded
Front number plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread
Front tyre valves age cracking
Offside rear wheel partially binding
Oil leaks
Rear wheel arches corroding
Couldn't see brakes properly
Exhaust system corroded
Front Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Offside Rear Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
exhaust corroded
front number plate water damaged
stone chips in windscreen
Offside Front constant velocity joint gaiter damaged to the extent that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc (2.5.C.1a)
Nearside Front constant velocity joint gaiter deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.5.C.1a)
exhaust corroded
front number plate water damaged
stone chips in windscreen
see advisory sheet 468747393197
Centre Stop lamp not working (1.2.1b)
Nearside Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
Front Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front constant velocity joint gaiter deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.5.C.1a)
Offside Front Anti-roll bar rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Oil leak
age cracking to outer cv boots
corrosion to rear wheel arches
corrosion to sills
electrolite on battery terminals
exhaust corroded
Front Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
rear brake grabbing slightly (3.7.A.5b)
stone chips in windscreen
water damage to front no.plate
front tyres getting low on inner edges
water ingress to nsf indiactor lamp
Front Exhaust has part of the system slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
Front constant velocity joint gaiter deteriorated (2.5.C.1a)
Nearside Inner Front Road wheel with a slightly distorted bead rim (4.2.A.1a)
rear no.plate poor
stone chips in windscreen
Front Exhaust has part of the system slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
Front constant velocity joint gaiter deteriorated (2.5.C.1a)
slight damage to nsf sill
water damage to rear no.plate
Nearside Headlamp aim too low (1.8)
Nearside Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.5c)
rear brake application uneven (3.7.B.2)
Front Exhaust has part of the system slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
Front constant velocity joint gaiter deteriorated (2.5.C.1a)
high handbrake travel
rear brake grabbing slightly (3.7.A.5b)
slight damage to nsf sill
water damage to rear no.plate
Nearside Front Road wheel with a slightly distorted bead rim (4.2.A.1a)
Nearside Front Road wheel slightly damaged (4.2.A.1a)
How Reliable is the Rover 25?
Based on 1,784,341 MOT tests across 157,261 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
W559 KBJ is a 2000 Rover 25 in Blue with a 1,396cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 15 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 73.3%.
Across all 2000 Rover 25 models, the average MOT pass rate is 70.0% with a typical mileage of 62,411 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Rover 25 fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 69,670 recorded failures. If you're considering buying W559 KBJ, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Rover 25 typically stays on UK roads for around 26 years. At 26 years old, this Rover 25 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of W559 KBJ?
You can check the full history of W559 KBJ by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was W559 KBJ registered?
W559 KBJ is a 2000 Rover 25, first registered on 1 March 2000.
Is W559 KBJ safe to buy?
The MOT history for W559 KBJ shows 15 tests with a 73.3% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does W559 KBJ have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on W559 KBJ. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.