MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
69,997 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Fluid leak, but not excessive power steering (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Offside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Offside rear seat belt clip inop
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Rear offside and nearside rear inner rear wheel archs corroded and holed
general underbody and suspension corrosion
handbrake long
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength inner sill to wheel arch (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength inner sill to wheel arch (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Fluid leak, but not excessive power steering (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Offside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Offside rear seat belt clip inop
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Rear offside and nearside rear inner rear wheel archs corroded and holed
general underbody and suspension corrosion
handbrake long
Hydraulic leak, but not excessive ps (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Offside Front Outer Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated small split (6.1.7 (g) (i))
Offside Rear Wheel bearing slightly noisy (5.1.3 (b) (i))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
general suspension and underbody component corrosion
offside and nearside rear inner wheel archs corroding
general underbody corrosion
offside and nearside rear inner wheel arch areas corroding
Nearside Front Outer Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (6.1.7 (g) (ii))
Rear Brakes imbalanced across an axle Axle 2 (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Service brake efficiency below requirements (1.2.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Tyre has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Offside Rear Tyre has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
general underbody corrosion
offside and nearside rear inner wheel arch areas corroding
Front Service brake fluctuating, but not excessively (1.2.1 (e))
Hydraulic leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Seat belt buckle slightly damaged rear buckles plastics (7.1.2 (d))
Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing both rear tyres (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Hydraulic leak, but not excessive power steering (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
both rear tyre walls perished and splitting
all four tyres perished and cracked
both front brakes binding slightly
general underbody corrosion
all tyres perishing
general underbody corrosion
high level stoplamp inop
Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
all tyre walls perishing
high level stop lamp inop
Paintwork damage offside front
Nearside Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
Offside Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
Paintwork damage offside front
both rear tyre walls perishing
nearside front tyre wall perishing
Nearside Headlamp aim too high and too far to the left. (1.8)
Offside Headlamp aim too high and too far to the left. (1.8)
Offside Rear fog lamp not working (1.3.2b)
Offside Front Shock absorber has a slightly worn shock absorber pivot (2.7.4)
Nearside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Offside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Offside Front Shock absorber has a slightly worn shock absorber pivot (2.7.4)
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Nail in offside front tyre
small cut in nearside front tyre
How Reliable is the Nissan Micra?
Based on 10,566,512 MOT tests across 827,110 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
W59 PUS is a 2000 Nissan Micra in Silver with a 998cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 24 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 75%.
Across all 2000 Nissan Micra models, the average MOT pass rate is 69.5% with a typical mileage of 55,993 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Nissan Micra fails its MOT is suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded, accounting for 413,594 recorded failures. If you're considering buying W59 PUS, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Nissan Micra typically stays on UK roads for around 37 years. At 26 years old, this Nissan Micra is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of W59 PUS?
You can check the full history of W59 PUS by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was W59 PUS registered?
W59 PUS is a 2000 Nissan Micra, first registered on 10 May 2000.
Is W59 PUS safe to buy?
The MOT history for W59 PUS shows 24 tests with a 75% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does W59 PUS have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on W59 PUS. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.