MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
140,273 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
General corrosion to rear chassis.
Headlamp has less than 1/2 LEDs not functioning Both. (4.1.1 (a) (i))
Movement in drivers seat back.
N/S/R Tyre losing shape.
Parking brake performance only just met.
General corrosion to rear chassis.
Headlamp has less than 1/2 LEDs not functioning Both. (4.1.1 (a) (i))
Movement in drivers seat back.
N/S/R Tyre losing shape.
Nearside Headlamp not working on dipped beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Parking brake performance only just met.
Movement in drivers seat back.
N/S Headlamp lens faded.
Rear metal brake pipes corroded.
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Service brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Braking system leaking Both front to rear pipes at metal flexi. (3.6.A.1) DANGEROUS
Movement in drivers seat back.
N/S Headlamp lens faded.
Rear metal brake pipes corroded.
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit low spots on edges (4.1.E.1)
handbrake weak, on pass limit
movement in drivers seatback
Offside Track rod end ball joint has excessive play (2.2.B.1f)
Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit low spots on edges (4.1.E.1)
handbrake weak, on pass limit
movement in drivers seatback
movement in drivers seat back
n/s headlamp slightly dim
n/s mirror damaged
o/s/r tyre inner edge mishapen
oil/coolant leak
Offside Front Tyre has ply or cords exposed (4.1.D.1b)
Nearside Front Tyre has ply or cords exposed (4.1.D.1b) DANGEROUS
front discs in poor condition
movement in drivers seat back
n/s headlamp slightly dim
n/s mirror damaged
o/s/r tyre inner edge mishapen
oil/coolant leak
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Nearside Front Headlamp aim beam image obviously incorrect (1.8.A.1b)
Offside Front Headlamp aim beam image obviously incorrect (1.8.A.1b)
Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.5.1g)
Rear Stop lamp not working (1.2.1b)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Nearside Front Track rod end ball joint has excessive play (2.2.B.1f)
Play in steering rack inner joint(s)
front tyres wearing edges
Fuel system component leaking (7.2.3)
Nearside rear parking brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.6a)
Offside rear parking brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.6a)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
rear tyres starting to crack
Exhaust emits an excessive level of metered smoke for a turbo charged engine (7.4.B.3b)
Nearside Front Direction indicator incorrect colour (1.4.A.2f)
Nearside Front position lamp(s) obscured more than 50% (1.1.A.3c)
Offside Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Front tyre wear edges N/S/F tyre close to limits
N/S and O/S/R tyres cracking side walls and tread close to limits border line
Poss fuel leak filler neck stains ?
Offside Front Upper Driver's seat insecure (6.2.A.1)
both rear tyre side walls starting to perrish.
How Reliable is the Chrysler Grand Voyager?
Based on 387,238 MOT tests across 25,998 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
W602 XNM is a 2000 Chrysler Grand Voyager in Blue with a 2,499cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 22 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 59.1%.
Across all 2000 Chrysler Grand Voyager models, the average MOT pass rate is 63.9% with a typical mileage of 99,701 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Chrysler Grand Voyager fails its MOT is parking brake: efficiency below requirements, accounting for 26,896 recorded failures. If you're considering buying W602 XNM, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Chrysler Grand Voyager typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 26 years old, this Chrysler Grand Voyager is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of W602 XNM?
You can check the full history of W602 XNM by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was W602 XNM registered?
W602 XNM is a 2000 Chrysler Grand Voyager, first registered on 3 June 2000.
Is W602 XNM safe to buy?
The MOT history for W602 XNM shows 22 tests with a 59.1% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does W602 XNM have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on W602 XNM. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.