MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
97,344 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Anti-roll bar linkage corroded but not seriously weakened Both front and rear ARB links (2.4.G.1)
Both rear inner sills / jacking points are corroded
Brake pad(s) wearing thin Both front brake pads (3.5.1g)
Front and rear vehicle structure areas has corrosion
Fuel Pipe/s corroded ()
Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced Both front headlamp lens (1.7.5a)
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Rear axle beam corroded
Sills covers and under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components and areas
Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened Both front lower arms (2.4.G.1)
Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Both rear lower suspension arms front mounting areas (2.4.A.3)
Track rod end ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt Both front track rod ends dust covers (2.2.C.1c)
Track rod end slightly corroded but serviceable Both track control arms and track rod ends (2.2.C.1d)
brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Both front brake discs (3.5.1i)
coil spring corroded Both rear coil springs (2.4.C.1b)
Front Tyre(s) incorrect because different size tyres are fitted on the same axle. (4.1.A.1a)
Anti-roll bar linkage corroded but not seriously weakened Both front and rear ARB links (2.4.G.1)
Both rear inner sills / jacking points are corroded
Brake pad(s) wearing thin Both front brake pads (3.5.1g)
Front and rear vehicle structure areas has corrosion
Fuel Pipe/s corroded ()
Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced Both front headlamp lens (1.7.5a)
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Rear axle beam corroded
Sills covers and under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components and areas
Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened Both front lower arms (2.4.G.1)
Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Both rear lower suspension arms front mounting areas (2.4.A.3)
Track rod end ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt Both front track rod ends dust covers (2.2.C.1c)
Track rod end slightly corroded but serviceable Both track control arms and track rod ends (2.2.C.1d)
brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Both front brake discs (3.5.1i)
coil spring corroded Both rear coil springs (2.4.C.1b)
Nearside Rear Anti-roll bar linkage has slight play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Stop lamp not working (1.2.1b)
Offside Stop lamp not working (1.2.1b)
Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Nearside Rear Anti-roll bar linkage has slight play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output (1.7.5a)
Headlight beam image poor
Offside Headlamp not working on dipped beam (1.7.5a)
Windscreen has damage to the swept area in excess of a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output (1.7.5a)
Vehicle presented in wet conditions
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 10mm circle within zone 'A' (8.3.1a)
Offside Rear Anti-roll bar linkage fractured (2.4.G.1)
Nearside Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Nearside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
How Reliable is the Honda Hr-v?
Based on 453,253 MOT tests across 47,982 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
W652 JAU is a 2000 Honda Hr-v in Black with a 1,590cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 17 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 64.7%.
Across all 2000 Honda Hr-v models, the average MOT pass rate is 72.3% with a typical mileage of 83,993 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Honda Hr-v fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 10,151 recorded failures. If you're considering buying W652 JAU, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Honda Hr-v typically stays on UK roads for around 27 years. At 26 years old, this Honda Hr-v is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of W652 JAU?
You can check the full history of W652 JAU by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was W652 JAU registered?
W652 JAU is a 2000 Honda Hr-v, first registered on 17 March 2000.
Is W652 JAU safe to buy?
The MOT history for W652 JAU shows 17 tests with a 64.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does W652 JAU have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on W652 JAU. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.