MOT Status
ValidMileage
78,214 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced forks (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Front Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced wheel (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced frame (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced wheel (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a))
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.0 mm thick (1.1.13 (a)) DANGEROUS
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced forks (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Front Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced wheel (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced frame (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced wheel (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced bike frame structure showing signs of corrosion (6.1.1 (c) (i))
rear brake showing low effort at rear wheel
Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced frames corroded (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Front Headlamp not working on dipped beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced frames corroded (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (5.2.3 (e))
Front Brake indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (1.2.1 (e))
Rear Brake indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (1.2.1 (e))
Front Stop lamp does not illuminate immediately a brake applies (1.3.1a)
Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Clutch lever bent (6.2.1g)
Exhaust is leaking but is not excessively noisey (7.1.1b)
Exhaust slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (3.2A1f(ii))
Front Sidecar wheel has a slightly distorted bead rim. (4.2.2)
Front tyre worn slightly unevenly
Speedometer not working
Steering movement slightly 'notchy' (2.2.1a)
Tyre worn close to the legal limit Rear tyre tread depth currently 1mm (4.1.3(ii))
Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Clutch lever bent (6.2.1g)
Exhaust is leaking but is not excessively noisey (7.1.1b)
Exhaust slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (3.2A1f(ii))
Front Sidecar wheel has a slightly distorted bead rim. (4.2.2)
Front tyre worn slightly unevenly
Headlamp aim beam image kick up to the offside (1.6)
Speedometer not working
Steering movement slightly 'notchy' (2.2.1a)
Tyre worn close to the legal limit Rear tyre tread depth currently 1mm (4.1.3(ii))
Steering movement slightly 'notchy' (2.2.1b)
Front Roller brake test indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (3.3.A1d)
Headlamp aim beam image kick up to the offside (1.6)
Front Roller brake test indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (3.3.A1d)
Exhaust is leaking but is not excessively noisey (7.1.1b)
Front Brake disc(s) has slight run out (3.2.A1m)
Front Brake disc(s) slightly pitted (3.2.A1l)
Front Roller brake test indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (3.3.A1d)
Headlamp aim beam image kick up to the offside (1.6)
Rear Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (3.2A1f(ii))
Exhaust is leaking but is not excessively noisey (7.1.1b)
Front Brake disc(s) has slight run out (3.2.A1m)
Front Brake disc(s) slightly pitted (3.2.A1l)
Front Roller brake test indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (3.3.A1d)
Rear Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (3.2A1f(ii))
Front Brake disc(s) is slightly distorted (3.2.A1m)
Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (3.2.A1f(i))
Front Roller brake test indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (3.3.A1d)
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Rear Brake disc(s) slightly pitted (3.2.A1l)
Front Brake disc(s) is slightly distorted (3.2.A1m)
Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (3.2.A1f(i))
Front Roller brake test indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (3.3.A1d)
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Rear Brake disc(s) slightly pitted (3.2.A1l)
Stop lamp does not illuminate immediately a brake applies (1.3.1a)
Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Headlamp aim beam image kick up to the offside (1.6)
Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Drive chain worn but not considered excessive (6.2.1e)
Front Brake disc(s) slightly scored (3.2.A1l)
Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Headlamp masks/converters fitted
Nail in rear tyre
Rear Drive chain sprocket slightly worn (6.2.1e)
Slight cush drive wear.
front mudgaurd cracked
Rear Floor brake test indicates a binding brake (3.3.C2c)
How Reliable is the Kawasaki VN800?
Based on 28,140 MOT tests across 2,110 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
WA51 EGC is a 2000 Kawasaki VN800 in Red with a 805cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 26 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 65.4%.
Across all 2000 Kawasaki VN800 models, the average MOT pass rate is 87.3% with a typical mileage of 17,374 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Kawasaki VN800 fails its MOT is tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm, accounting for 299 recorded failures. If you're considering buying WA51 EGC, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Kawasaki VN800 typically stays on UK roads for around 31 years. At 26 years old, this Kawasaki VN800 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of WA51 EGC?
You can check the full history of WA51 EGC by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was WA51 EGC registered?
WA51 EGC is a 2000 Kawasaki VN800, first registered on 31 December 2000.
Is WA51 EGC safe to buy?
The MOT history for WA51 EGC shows 26 tests with a 65.4% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does WA51 EGC have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on WA51 EGC. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.