MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
65,701 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Rear coil spring modified but not seriously weakened It has movement when jack up . (2.4.A.2)
Offside Rear coil spring modified but not seriously weakened It has movement when jack up. (2.4.A.2)
Oil leak ()
Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content excessive (7.3.B.1a)
Nearside Rear coil spring modified but not seriously weakened It has movement when jack up . (2.4.A.2)
Offside Rear coil spring modified but not seriously weakened It has movement when jack up. (2.4.A.2)
Oil leak ()
Nearside Front Tie bar/rod synthetic bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Upper Radius arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Steering column universal joint has slight play (2.1.5)
Brakes imbalanced across an axle (3.7.B.5b)
Hazard warning lamps inoperative (1.4.B.1b)
Horn not working (1.6.2a)
Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)
Nearside Front Tie bar/rod synthetic bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Upper Radius arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Steering column universal joint has slight play (2.1.5)
rear suspension bushes perishing
trailing arm bushes worn
Brake pedal spongy (3.3.B.1b)
Nearside Front brake caliper locking device missing (3.5.1l)
Nearside Rear Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Tie bar/rod rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front brake caliper locking device missing (3.5.1l)
Offside Rear Body has a projection caused by damage (6.1.C.1)
rear suspension bushes perishing
Body has slight corrosion (6.1.B.2)
Parking brake: parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
Service brake: service brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
Vehicle structure has slight corrosion (6.1.A.1)
front number plate in poor condition
rear suspension arm bushes worn
slight foot brake travel
slight movement in front suspension swivels
Service brake: service brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
long foot brake travel,suspension components corroded,coil springs corroded,chassis members corroded,front number plate cracked
coil springs corroded,suspension components corroded,suspension bushes wearing,engin getting smokey
chassis members corroded,nearside front tie rod bush wearing,coil springs corroded,both rear suspension bushes wearing
Nearside Front Tie bar/rod has slight play in a pin/bush (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear Trailing arm has slight play in a pin/bush (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Trailing arm has slight play in a pin/bush (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Offside Front Tie bar/rod has excessive play in a pin/bush (2.4.G.2) DANGEROUS
advise front number plate for fatigue
advise nsf tie rod bush for fatigue
advise rear trail arm bushes
How Reliable is the Ford Cortina?
Based on 56,538 MOT tests across 7,991 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
WDX 201X is a 1982 Ford Cortina in Beige with a 1,593cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 21 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 81%.
Across all 1982 Ford Cortina models, the average MOT pass rate is 74.7% with a typical mileage of 57,071 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Ford Cortina fails its MOT is suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded, accounting for 2,806 recorded failures. If you're considering buying WDX 201X, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Cortina typically stays on UK roads for around 63 years. At 44 years old, this Ford Cortina is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of WDX 201X?
You can check the full history of WDX 201X by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was WDX 201X registered?
WDX 201X is a 1982 Ford Cortina, first registered on 9 March 1982.
Is WDX 201X safe to buy?
The MOT history for WDX 201X shows 21 tests with a 81% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does WDX 201X have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on WDX 201X. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.