MOT Status
ValidMileage
120,641 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Items removed from driver's view prior to test Device mounting bracket removed from screen ()
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Subframe mounting area (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule Both outer hoses at calipers (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Wiper blade defective
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Stone chip on screen (3.2 (a) (i))
Front Windscreen washer not working (3.5 (a))
Nearside Front Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect Lens cloudy/faded (4.1.2 (c))
Offside Front Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect Lens cloudy/faded (4.1.2 (c))
Rear Brake insecure Parking brake motor (1.1.21 (c))
Items removed from driver's view prior to test Device mounting bracket removed from screen ()
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Subframe mounting area (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive Engine (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule Both outer hoses at calipers (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Wiper blade defective
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Stone chip on screen (3.2 (a) (i))
2nd Line Rear Seatbelts Not Tested, Seats Not in Use
Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule Both Rears (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Nearside Rear Rear reflector defective or damaged by up to 50% of the reflecting surface (4.8.1 (a) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive Engine (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Wiper Blade Rubber Defective
Windscreen Stone Chipped
Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect Both Headlamp Lenses Deteriorated (4.1.2 (c))
Nearside Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (3.5 (a))
2nd Line Rear Seatbelts Not Tested, Seats Not in Use
Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule Both Rears (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Nearside Rear Rear reflector defective or damaged by up to 50% of the reflecting surface (4.8.1 (a) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive Engine (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Wiper Blade Rubber Defective
Windscreen Stone Chipped
2nd Line Rear Seatbelts Not Tested, Seats Not in Use
Brake pad(s) wearing thin Both Rears Inners (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output Both Headlamps Deteriorated with Poor Beam Images (4.1.4 (b))
Nearside Rear Rear reflector defective or damaged by up to 50% of the reflecting surface (4.8.1 (a) (i))
Front Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (3.5 (a))
2nd Line Rear Seatbelts Not Tested, Seats Not in Use
Brake pad(s) wearing thin Both Rears Inners (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output Both Headlamps Deteriorated with Poor Beam Images (4.1.4 (b))
Nearside Rear Rear reflector defective or damaged by up to 50% of the reflecting surface (4.8.1 (a) (i))
2nd Line Rear Seatbelts Not Tested
Nearside Rear Inner Position lamp light intensity obviously reduced (4.2.3 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Position lamp with a multiple light source up to 1/2 not functioning (4.2.1 (a) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive Engine (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Play in steering rack inner joint(s) Both Inner Joints ()
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush Both Fronts Lower Bushes Deteriorated (5.3.2 (c))
Windscreen Stone Chipped
Offside Front Headlamp aim not tested (4.1.2 (b))
Offside Front Headlamp not working on dipped beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Rear fog lamp not working Both Rears (ingress of moisture in both lamps) (4.5.1 (a) (ii))
Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid Both Fronts (3.5 (a))
2nd Line Rear Seatbelts Not Tested
Oil leak, but not excessive Engine (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Play in steering rack inner joint(s) Both Inner Joints ()
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush Both Fronts Lower Bushes Deteriorated (5.3.2 (c))
Windscreen Stone Chipped
Rear fog lamp not working (4.5.1 (a) (ii))
Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (3.5 (a))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
undertrays fitted
under trays & engine covers fitted
Nearside Headlamp aim beam image obviously incorrect (1.8.A.1b)
N/S/F and O/S/F tyre worn low on on outer edges
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar linkage has slight play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint dust cover excessively deteriorated so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Headlamp aim too far to the left (1.8)
Front wipers smearing slightly
Nail in nearside front tyre
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
How Reliable is the BMW X5?
Based on 1,735,343 MOT tests across 137,484 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
WF58 GMX is a 2009 BMW X5 in Black with a 2,993cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 22 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 68.2%.
Across all 2009 BMW X5 models, the average MOT pass rate is 79.2% with a typical mileage of 86,008 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a BMW X5 fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 31,544 recorded failures. If you're considering buying WF58 GMX, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The BMW X5 typically stays on UK roads for around 25 years. At 17 years old, this BMW X5 is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of WF58 GMX?
You can check the full history of WF58 GMX by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was WF58 GMX registered?
WF58 GMX is a 2009 BMW X5, first registered on 30 January 2009.
Is WF58 GMX safe to buy?
The MOT history for WF58 GMX shows 22 tests with a 68.2% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does WF58 GMX have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on WF58 GMX. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.