MOT Status
ValidMileage
75,105 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Offside Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
exhaust slightly deteriorated
Nearside Front Position lamp not working side lamp (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
exhaust slightly deteriorated
Driver's view Items removed from driver's view prior to test air freshener and pendant now on dash (3.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Sub-frame is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced subframe attachment to chassis heavily corroded vertical. (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material brake ferrules x2 on rear axle (1.1.11 (c))
Fuel cap/sealing device component leaking filler neck corroded and holed not preventing fuel leak (6.1.3 (b) (i))
Driver's view Items removed from driver's view prior to test air freshener and pendant now on dash (3.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Sub-frame is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced subframe attachment to chassis heavily corroded vertical. (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material brake ferrules x2 on rear axle (1.1.11 (c))
Exhaust system deteriorated/ corroded
Nearside Rear Tyre has a cut but not deep enough to reach the ply or cords (5.2.3 (d) (i))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn rear bush - bonding failed (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn rear bush - bonding failed (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Registration plate lamp does not illuminate simultaneously with the position lamps (4.7.2 (a))
Exhaust system deteriorated/ corroded
Nearside Front Direction indicator slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
Nearside Rear Tyre has a cut but not deep enough to reach the ply or cords (5.2.3 (d) (i))
Central Rear Stop lamp(s) not working (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge and rear (5.2.3 (e))
Items removed from driver's view prior to test ()
Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Front Direction indicator incorrect colour (4.4.3 (a))
Offside Rear Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of a single lamp or all lamps (4.7.1 (b) (ii))
Offside Front Direction indicator has a product on the lens but not adversely affecting light output (1.4.A.2e)
Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively both (8.2.2)
Rear Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Offside Front Direction indicator has a product on the lens but not adversely affecting light output (1.4.A.2e)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
both front tyres low on edges nearside on 3mm tread
Child seat fitted not allowing full inspection of adult belt
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Child seat fitted not allowing full inspection of adult belt
Front Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
How Reliable is the Nissan Micra?
Based on 10,566,512 MOT tests across 827,110 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
WF59 NJN is a 2009 Nissan Micra in Black with a 1,240cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 20 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 65%.
Across all 2009 Nissan Micra models, the average MOT pass rate is 76.3% with a typical mileage of 48,236 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Nissan Micra fails its MOT is suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded, accounting for 413,594 recorded failures. If you're considering buying WF59 NJN, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Nissan Micra typically stays on UK roads for around 37 years. At 17 years old, this Nissan Micra is still in the earlier part of its expected life.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of WF59 NJN?
You can check the full history of WF59 NJN by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was WF59 NJN registered?
WF59 NJN is a 2009 Nissan Micra, first registered on 14 November 2009.
Is WF59 NJN safe to buy?
The MOT history for WF59 NJN shows 20 tests with a 65% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does WF59 NJN have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on WF59 NJN. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.