MOT Status
ValidMileage
49,524 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule fronts and rears (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
sills,chassis and front wings corroded
suspension and steering componants corroded
Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened offside & nearside upper & lower suspension arms corroding (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced General surface corrosion of vehicle underside & components (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Rear Coil spring corroded suspension (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened offside & nearside upper & lower suspension arms corroding (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened offside & nearside upper & lower suspension arms corroding (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened offside & nearside upper & lower suspension arms corroding (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Anti-lock braking system warning lamp indicates an ABS fault (1.6 (b))
Engine MIL inoperative or indicates a malfunction (8.2.1.2 (h))
Offside Front Service brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened offside & nearside upper & lower suspension arms corroding (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened offside & nearside upper & lower suspension arms corroding (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened offside & nearside upper & lower suspension arms corroding (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Coil spring corroded suspension (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened offside & nearside upper & lower suspension arms corroding (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened offside & nearside upper & lower suspension arms corroded (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Coil spring corroded suspension (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened offside & nearside upper & lower suspension arms corroded (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Coil spring fractured or broken suspension (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Parking brake lever has excessive movement indicating incorrect adjustment (1.1.6 (c))
Nearside Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (1.1.13 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened offside & nearside upper & lower suspension arms corroded (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Coil spring corroded suspension (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened offside & nearside upper & lower suspension arms corroded (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Brake fluid contaminated (1.8 (a))
Offside Front Integral body structure or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of a body mounting Chassis leg holed by Anti-Roll bar mount (6.2.2 (d) (i))
Nearside Front Integral body structure or chassis corroded within 30cm of a mounting, but not seriously affecting overall security Chassis leg corroded by Anti-Roll bar mount (6.2.2 (d) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Nearside Headlamp lens slightly defective (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge 0mm inner edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge 0mm inner edge (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
various corrosion on majority of the suspension components
Offside Parking brake inoperative on one side (1.4.1 (a))
Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Nearside Headlamp lens slightly defective (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge 0mm inner edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge 0mm inner edge (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
various corrosion on majority of the suspension components
Offside Parking brake effort low
Suspension component corroded but not seriously weakened Surface corrosion on all suspension components (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Sill in poor Condition
Nearside Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.5.1g)
Offside Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.5.1g)
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Brakes imbalanced across an axle (3.7.B.5b)
Nearside Rear coil spring fractured (2.4.C.1a)
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Brakes imbalanced across an axle (3.7.B.5b)
Nearside Rear Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (4.1.D.1a)
Offside Front Mechanical brake component has restricted free movement (3.5.1k)
Advise:- All tyres cracking in between tread..?
N/S REAR TYRE CUT ON INSIDE
Nearside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Nearside Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Offside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Offside Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
How Reliable is the Mazda MX-5?
Based on 2,502,760 MOT tests across 160,823 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
WG52 RCV is a 2003 Mazda MX-5 in Green with a 1,840cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 27 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 74.1%.
Across all 2003 Mazda MX-5 models, the average MOT pass rate is 75.2% with a typical mileage of 60,251 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Mazda MX-5 fails its MOT is seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded, accounting for 44,475 recorded failures. If you're considering buying WG52 RCV, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Mazda MX-5 typically stays on UK roads for around 36 years. At 23 years old, this Mazda MX-5 is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of WG52 RCV?
You can check the full history of WG52 RCV by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was WG52 RCV registered?
WG52 RCV is a 2003 Mazda MX-5, first registered on 31 January 2003.
Is WG52 RCV safe to buy?
The MOT history for WG52 RCV shows 27 tests with a 74.1% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does WG52 RCV have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on WG52 RCV. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.