MOT Status
ValidMileage
173,550 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Both rear brake flexi hose brackets corroded
Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule Both rear (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Brake pedal wearing smooth (1.1.2 (c))
Offside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Suspension component corroded but not seriously weakened Rear axle corroded (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Vehicle underbody (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Engine MIL inoperative or indicates a malfunction (8.2.2.2 (g))
Nearside Rear Brake pipe likely to become detached or damaged Pipe/ flexi bracket corroded (1.1.11 (d) (ii))
Offside Rear Brake drum back plate insecure Excessively corroded (1.1.14 (d))
Offside Track rod end ball joint has excessive play (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Both rear brake flexi hose brackets corroded
Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule Both rear (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Brake pedal wearing smooth (1.1.2 (c))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Suspension component corroded but not seriously weakened Rear axle corroded (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Both front, worn on edges (5.2.3 (e))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Vehicle underbody (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Both rear brake flexi brackets corroded
Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule Both rear (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Brake pedal wearing smooth (1.1.2 (c))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Brake backplate corroded
Rear axle corroded
Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing Both rear (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Vehicle underbody corroded (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule Both rear (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Brake pedal wearing smooth (1.1.2 (c))
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Brake pedal wearing smooth (1.1.2 (c))
Central Stop lamp(s) with a multiple light source up to 1/2 not functioning (4.3.1 (a) (i))
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear exhaust clamp broken
Brake pedal wearing smooth (1.1.2 (c))
Central Stop lamp(s) with a multiple light source up to 1/2 not functioning (4.3.1 (a) (i))
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
rear exhaust clamp corroded
Engine MIL inoperative or indicates a malfunction (8.2.2.2 (g))
Nearside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Nearside Rear Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords perishing and cracking (5.2.3 (d) (i))
Offside Front Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm showing cords (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Brake pedal wearing smooth (1.1.2 (c))
Central Stop lamp(s) with a multiple light source up to 1/2 not functioning (4.3.1 (a) (i))
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge perishing and cracking (5.2.3 (e))
Shock absorbers has light misting of oil both front (5.3.2 (b))
rear exhaust clamp corroded
Both rear tyres perishing/cracking
Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule Both rear (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Engine combustion gases leaking slightly
Nearside Front tyre has slight damage to outer sidewall
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear exhaust clamp broken
Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Both front, on inner edge (5.2.3 (e))
Shock absorbers has an excessively worn bush Both rear, upper bush (5.3.2 (c))
Both rear tyres perishing/cracking
Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule Both rear (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Engine combustion gases leaking slightly
Nearside Front tyre has slight damage to outer sidewall
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear exhaust clamp broken
Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Both front, on inner edge (5.2.3 (e))
both top suspension strut bearings slighty noisy
handbrake has little reserve travel
wiper linkage worn
Parking brake lever has little reserve travel (3.1.6b)
Tyre worn close to the legal limit both front on inner edges (4.1.E.1)
wear in wiper mechanism
Nearside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear Valve stem seriously damaged (4.1.D.1e)
Offside Rear Valve stem seriously damaged (4.1.D.1e)
Parking brake lever has little reserve travel (3.1.6b)
Tyre worn close to the legal limit both front on inner edges (4.1.E.1)
wear in wiper mechanism
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm 185/65/r15 88h (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Headlamp aim too low (1.8)
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage has slight play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
both rear tyres uneven wear
How Reliable is the Citroen Nemo?
Based on 279,608 MOT tests across 21,949 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
WL12 BAA is a 2012 Citroen Nemo in White with a 1,396cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 17 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 70.6%.
Across all 2012 Citroen Nemo models, the average MOT pass rate is 72.8% with a typical mileage of 74,468 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Citroen Nemo fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 4,767 recorded failures. If you're considering buying WL12 BAA, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Citroen Nemo typically stays on UK roads for around 18 years. At 14 years old, this Citroen Nemo is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of WL12 BAA?
You can check the full history of WL12 BAA by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was WL12 BAA registered?
WL12 BAA is a 2012 Citroen Nemo, first registered on 30 April 2012.
Is WL12 BAA safe to buy?
The MOT history for WL12 BAA shows 17 tests with a 70.6% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does WL12 BAA have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on WL12 BAA. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.