MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
106,357 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Exhaust mounting defective rear mounting broken / heat shield insecure and corrosion on system (6.1.2 (a))
Front Direction indicator slightly discoloured both lamps (4.4.3 (a))
Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge both tyres worn on edges (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement rear wishbone bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread faded (0.1 (b))
Rear Service brake fluctuating, but not excessively both brakes (1.2.1 (e))
Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge both tyres worn on inner edges and cut on nearside rear tread (5.2.3 (e))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced chassis and sills (6.1.1 (c) (i))
both rear shock absorber dust covers adrift and offside damp
park brake efficiency only just met
under trays fitted obscuring components
Nearside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Offside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Exhaust mounting defective rear mounting broken / heat shield insecure and corrosion on system (6.1.2 (a))
Front Direction indicator slightly discoloured both lamps (4.4.3 (a))
Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge both tyres worn on edges (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement rear wishbone bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread faded (0.1 (b))
Rear Service brake fluctuating, but not excessively both brakes (1.2.1 (e))
Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge both tyres worn on inner edges and cut on nearside rear tread (5.2.3 (e))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced chassis and sills (6.1.1 (c) (i))
both rear shock absorber dust covers adrift and offside damp
park brake efficiency only just met
under trays fitted obscuring components
Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced offside & nearside (1.7.5a)
coil spring corroded offside & nearside rear (2.4.C.1b)
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover excessively deteriorated so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear wheel bearing rough when rotated (2.6.1)
Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced offside & nearside (1.7.5a)
coil spring corroded offside & nearside rear (2.4.C.1b)
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Exhaust emits excessive smoke or vapour of any colour (7.4.B.4)
Headlamp excessively deteriorated so that the light output is severely reduced offside & nearside (1.7.5a)
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced offside & nearside (1.7.5a)
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Front registration plate delaminated (6.3.1d)
Suspension arm synthetic bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement offside & nearside front lower (2.4.G.2)
Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced offside & nearside (1.7.5a)
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced (1.7.5a)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.5.1g)
Offside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Exhaust emits excessive smoke or vapour of any colour (7.4.B.4)
Nearside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
How Reliable is the Ford C-max?
Based on 1,804,249 MOT tests across 138,182 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
WL55 BTF is a 2005 Ford C-max in Black with a 1,753cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 20 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 65%.
Across all 2005 Ford C-max models, the average MOT pass rate is 72.5% with a typical mileage of 76,961 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Ford C-max fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 25,824 recorded failures. If you're considering buying WL55 BTF, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford C-max typically stays on UK roads for around 20 years. At 21 years old, this Ford C-max is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of WL55 BTF?
You can check the full history of WL55 BTF by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was WL55 BTF registered?
WL55 BTF is a 2005 Ford C-max, first registered on 21 December 2005.
Is WL55 BTF safe to buy?
The MOT history for WL55 BTF shows 20 tests with a 65% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does WL55 BTF have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on WL55 BTF. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.