MOT Status
ValidMileage
124,675 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output (4.1.4 (b))
Rear Suspension component corroded but not seriously weakened Both sides (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Brake fluid significantly below minimum mark (1.1.10 (d) (ii))
Front Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output (4.1.4 (b))
Rear Registration plate lamp missing in the case of a single lamp or all lamps (4.7.1 (b) (ii))
Rear Suspension component corroded but not seriously weakened Both sides (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated both sides (5.3.4 (b) (i))
All rear bushes deteriorated
Front Headlamp lens slightly defective both side (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn both side (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Exhaust system insecure (6.1.2 (a))
All rear bushes deteriorated
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Front and rear (both side) (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated both side (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Front Headlamp lens slightly defective both side (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Track rod end ball joint dust cover damaged or deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.1.3 (g) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear brake pads wearing thin
Front Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated Both (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both TCA rear bushes (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output Both frosted (4.1.4 (b))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both Trailing arm forward bushes (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated Both (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both TCA rear bushes (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output Both frosted (4.1.4 (b))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both Trailing arm forward bushes (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Both front lower suspension arm rear bushes slightly deteriorated and ball joint gaiters slightly perished
Both rear suspension trailing arm forward bushes slightly deteriorated
Both front lower suspension arm ball joint gaiters deteriorating
Both front lower suspension arm rear bushes deteriorated
Front number plate deteriorating
Both front lower arm rear bushes deteriorating
Both rear tyres wearing on inner edges
Exhaust hangers corroded
Front headlamps deteriorating
Offside front tyre cracked & perished
Both front lower arm rear bushes deteriorating
Both rear tyres wearing on inner edges
Exhaust hangers corroded
Rear trailing arm bushes deteriorating
Underside of vehicle starting to corrode
Both front lower suspension arm rear bushes slightly deteriorated
Both rear tyres slightly worn on inner edge
both front lower suspension arm rear bushes slightly deteriorated
nearside rear tyre slightly perished
rear brake pads worn thin
Sump corroded
both front lower suspension arm rear bushes slightly deteriorated
Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.5b)
Front number plate slightly damaged
Front pads wearing low
Child seat fitted not allowing full inspection of adult belt
How Reliable is the Mazda 3?
Based on 2,040,939 MOT tests across 164,053 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
WN07 WBL is a 2007 Mazda 3 in Grey with a 1,598cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 20 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 85%.
Across all 2007 Mazda 3 models, the average MOT pass rate is 74.7% with a typical mileage of 68,986 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Mazda 3 fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 40,716 recorded failures. If you're considering buying WN07 WBL, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Mazda 3 typically stays on UK roads for around 22 years. At 19 years old, this Mazda 3 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of WN07 WBL?
You can check the full history of WN07 WBL by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was WN07 WBL registered?
WN07 WBL is a 2007 Mazda 3, first registered on 27 April 2007.
Is WN07 WBL safe to buy?
The MOT history for WN07 WBL shows 20 tests with a 85% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does WN07 WBL have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on WN07 WBL. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.