MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
203,082 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Both rear wheel arches and O/S outer sill have traces of surface rust
Brake pipes covered with sealant
Front Track rod end ball joint dust cover damaged, but preventing the ingress of dirt Both sides (2.2.C.1c)
Front suspension ball joint dust cover damaged, but preventing the ingress of dirt Both sides (2.4.G.2)
Service and parking brake requirements only just met
registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread Front and rear (6.3.1d)
Both rear wheel arches and O/S outer sill have traces of surface rust
Brake pipes covered with sealant
Front Track rod end ball joint dust cover damaged, but preventing the ingress of dirt Both sides (2.2.C.1c)
Front suspension ball joint dust cover damaged, but preventing the ingress of dirt Both sides (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Windscreen wiper blade insecure (8.2.2)
Service and parking brake requirements only just met
registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread Front and rear (6.3.1d)
Rear Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
Rear Parking brake: parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
front disc pitted. rear disc pitted. nearsides front cv boot worn. two front lin kage slight play. two front track rode ends slight play.two rear shock slight mist of oil. two front steering arm play
nearsides front wish bone brush slight worntwo front top moning slight play
two rear inner sill suface rusty
Engine covers fitted obscuring some components in the engine bay
Front Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Nearside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Front Track rod end ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.2.C.1c)
Offside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (2.4.A.3)
Parking brake: parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
Play in steering rack inner joint(s)
Rear Shock absorber has slight corrosion to the casing (2.7.2a)
Rear coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
Under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components
rear chassis area corroded
Engine covers fitted obscuring some components in the engine bay
Parking brake: parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
Service brake: service brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
Under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components
n/s & o/s inner sills corrodid front to rear but not considerd as exsessive.
under body has corrosion but not considerd as exsessive.
Parking brake: parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
Oil leak
Nearside Stop lamp not working (1.2.1b)
Offside Stop lamp not working (1.2.1b)
Oil leak
Nearside Stop lamp not working (1.2.1b)
Nearside Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Offside Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
How Reliable is the Ford Galaxy?
Based on 2,683,070 MOT tests across 199,482 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
WR03 PVJ is a 2003 Ford Galaxy in Silver with a 1,896cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 14 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 78.6%.
Across all 2003 Ford Galaxy models, the average MOT pass rate is 68.6% with a typical mileage of 96,357 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Ford Galaxy fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 102,272 recorded failures. If you're considering buying WR03 PVJ, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Galaxy typically stays on UK roads for around 31 years. At 23 years old, this Ford Galaxy is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of WR03 PVJ?
You can check the full history of WR03 PVJ by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was WR03 PVJ registered?
WR03 PVJ is a 2003 Ford Galaxy, first registered on 1 August 2003.
Is WR03 PVJ safe to buy?
The MOT history for WR03 PVJ shows 14 tests with a 78.6% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does WR03 PVJ have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on WR03 PVJ. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.