MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
72,980 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Oil leak, but not excessive shaft seal (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Nearside Oil leak, but not excessive drive shaft oil seal (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Nearside Headlamp aim too high (4.1.2 (a))
Nearside Headlamp not working on main beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Oil leak, but not excessive drive shaft oil seal (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Offside Headlamp aim too high (4.1.2 (a))
Offside Headlamp not working on dipped beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Headlamp not working on main beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Front & rear tyres different sizes
Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated Both (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Fuel filler cap seal perished
Headlamp beam patterns poor due to poor quality bulbs fitted
Nearside Rear Integral body structure is repaired but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Wheel arch. Visibly evidence indicates a nearside rear impact (6.1.1 (d) (i))
Nearside Rear Lower Integral body structure is repaired but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Door sill repaired to a very poor standard. Door frame also accident damaged & distorted. Lower outer sill damaged. Filled & painted so closer evaluation not possible (6.1.1 (d) (i))
Nearside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Rear Lower Integral body structure is repaired but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Sill to floor damaged & repaired to a very poor standard. Filled & painted so closer evaluation not possible (6.1.1 (d) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Wheel bearing rough when rotated (5.1.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar linkage pin or bush likely to become detached Fitted incorrectly (5.3.4 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage pin or bush likely to become detached Fitted incorrectly (5.3.4 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Front & rear tyres different sizes
Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated Both (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Fuel filler cap seal perished
Headlamp beam patterns poor due to poor quality bulbs fitted
Nearside Rear Integral body structure is repaired but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Wheel arch. Visibly evidence indicates a nearside rear impact (6.1.1 (d) (i))
Nearside Rear Lower Integral body structure is repaired but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Door sill repaired to a very poor standard. Door frame also accident damaged & distorted. Lower outer sill damaged. Filled & painted so closer evaluation not possible (6.1.1 (d) (i))
Nearside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Rear Lower Integral body structure is repaired but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Sill to floor damaged & repaired to a very poor standard. Filled & painted so closer evaluation not possible (6.1.1 (d) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Wheel bearing rough when rotated (5.1.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Tyre has a cut but not deep enough to reach the ply or cords Outer sidewall 175/55 R15 (5.2.3 (d) (i))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge 175/55 R15 (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm 175/55R15 (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
How Reliable is the Mitsubishi Mirage?
Based on 97,130 MOT tests across 11,123 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
WU13 ZLZ is a 2013 Mitsubishi Mirage in Red with a 1,193cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 14 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 71.4%.
Across all 2013 Mitsubishi Mirage models, the average MOT pass rate is 83.4% with a typical mileage of 40,913 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Mitsubishi Mirage fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 316 recorded failures. If you're considering buying WU13 ZLZ, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Mitsubishi Mirage typically stays on UK roads for around 13 years. At 13 years old, this Mitsubishi Mirage is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of WU13 ZLZ?
You can check the full history of WU13 ZLZ by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was WU13 ZLZ registered?
WU13 ZLZ is a 2013 Mitsubishi Mirage, first registered on 1 March 2013.
Is WU13 ZLZ safe to buy?
The MOT history for WU13 ZLZ shows 14 tests with a 71.4% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does WU13 ZLZ have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on WU13 ZLZ. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.