MOT Status
ValidMileage
57,733 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Brake indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (1.2.1 (e))
Rear Brake slightly spongy
Headlamp not working on dipped beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Horn not working (7.7 (a))
Rear Wheel bearing has excessive play (5.1.3 (a) (i))
Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of a single lamp or all lamps (4.7.1 (b) (ii))
Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (6.1.2 (a))
Exhaust silencer slightly loose (8.1.1 (b) (i))
Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Brake indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (1.2.1 (e))
Rear Brake slightly spongy
Rear Position lamp light intensity obviously reduced (4.2.3 (a) (i))
Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Oil leak
Rear Brake torque arm deteriorated
Rear Position lamp light intensity obviously reduced (4.2.3 (a) (i))
Drive chain slightly loose tight - loose spots (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Drive chain worn but not considered excessive (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Front Brake indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (1.2.1 (e))
Front Stop lamp not working (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of a single lamp or all lamps (4.7.1 (b) (ii))
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.0 mm thick (1.1.13 (a)) DANGEROUS
Drive chain slightly loose tight - loose spots (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Drive chain worn but not considered excessive (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Front Brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Front Brake indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (1.2.1 (e))
Rear Position lamp light intensity obviously reduced (4.2.3 (a) (i))
Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Front Stop lamp not working (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
Rear Brake reaction bracket excessively corroded (1.1.15 (b))
Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.0 mm thick (1.1.13 (a)) DANGEROUS
Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Front Brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
Front Stop lamp not working (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (1.1.13 (a))
Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Front Brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (1.1.13 (a))
Front Stop lamp not working (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
Horn not working (7.7 (a) (ii))
Rear Brake drum in such a condition that it is seriously weakened scored (1.1.14 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.0 mm thick (1.1.13 (a)) DANGEROUS
Front Brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (1.1.13 (a))
Rear Nail in tyre ()
Rear Position lamp light intensity obviously reduced (4.2.3 (a) (i))
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (5.2.3 (e))
Stop lamp light intensity obviously reduced (4.3.3 (a) (i))
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (1.1.13 (a))
Rear Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (1.1.13 (a))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Stop lamp not working (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
Headlamp insecure (4.1.1 (c))
Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.0 mm thick (1.1.13 (a)) DANGEROUS
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Nail in tyre ()
Front Tyre valve stem slightly damaged (4.1.2c)
Rear Nail in tyre ()
Rear position lamp deteriorated but function not impaired (1.1.1b)
Brake disc(s) has excessive run out (3.2.A1m) DANGEROUS
Front Nail in tyre ()
Front Tyre valve stem slightly damaged (4.1.2c)
Rear Nail in tyre ()
Rear position lamp deteriorated but function not impaired (1.1.1b)
Front Roller brake test indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (3.3.A1d)
Front Roller brake test indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (3.3.A1d)
Rear Tyre not fitted in accordance with side wall instruction/s rotation incorrect (4.1.2e)
Rear Tyre valve stem slightly damaged (4.1.2c)
Rear Tyre valve stem slightly damaged (4.1.2c)
Rear tyre seriously under inflated
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Rear shock absorber seal failed and leaking oil (2.4.A.1c)
Exhaust is leaking but is not excessively noisey (7.1.1b)
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
How Reliable is the Suzuki GSF600?
Based on 257,530 MOT tests across 21,207 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
WX04 CAE is a 2004 Suzuki GSF600 in Silver with a 599cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 29 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 69%.
Across all 2004 Suzuki GSF600 models, the average MOT pass rate is 84.0% with a typical mileage of 15,706 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Suzuki GSF600 fails its MOT is tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm, accounting for 4,807 recorded failures. If you're considering buying WX04 CAE, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Suzuki GSF600 typically stays on UK roads for around 31 years. At 22 years old, this Suzuki GSF600 is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of WX04 CAE?
You can check the full history of WX04 CAE by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was WX04 CAE registered?
WX04 CAE is a 2004 Suzuki GSF600, first registered on 16 April 2004.
Is WX04 CAE safe to buy?
The MOT history for WX04 CAE shows 29 tests with a 69% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does WX04 CAE have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on WX04 CAE. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.