MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
13,545 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Lower Motorcycle structure is repaired but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (d) (i))
Nearside Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
Rear Brake lever has insufficient reserve travel (1.1.2 (a))
Rear Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Lower Motorcycle structure is repaired but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (d) (i))
Nearside Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
Central Lower Motorcycle structure is repaired but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (d) (i))
Lower Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Front Brake disc contaminated (1.1.14 (b))
Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of a single lamp or all lamps (4.7.1 (b) (ii))
Central Lower Motorcycle structure is repaired but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (d) (i))
Lower Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Front Brake pad(s) contaminated (1.1.13 (b))
Front Shock absorber has a serious fluid leak (5.3.2 (b))
Front Shock absorber has negligible damping effect (5.3.2 (b))
Motorcycle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced Floor Pan (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Direction indicator incorrect colour (4.4.3 (a))
Offside Indicator switch inoperative (4.4.2 (a) (ii))
Centre Stand Pivot Heavily Worn
Front Wheel bearing has slight play Slightly Noisy (5.1.3 (a) (i))
Seat Secure (Latch Inoperative)
Front Shock absorber has a reduced damping effect (5.3.2 (b))
Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Floor Pan (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Front Brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
Fuel cap ineffective Seal Missing (6.1.3 (b) (i))
Headlamp aim projected beam image obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Roller brake test The less effective brake control does not achieve an efficiency of 25% (1.2.2 (a) (i))
Steering headbearing has excessive wear or free play (2.2.2 (f) (i))
Front Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Rear Brake has no recorded effort at a wheel (1.2.1 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Rear Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Steering headbearing in such a condition that steering control is adversely affected (2.2.2 (f) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Stop lamp remains on when the brakes are released (4.3.2 (a) (iii)) DANGEROUS
Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (1.1.13 (a))
Front Shock absorber has a reduced damping effect (5.3.2 (b))
Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Floor Panel (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Tyre Pressure Soft
Speedo cable broken
Front Steering headbearing has excessive wear or free play (2.2.2 (f) (i))
Headlamp aim not tested (4.1.2 (b))
Horn not working (7.7 (a))
Rear Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Central Exhaust slightly loose (6.1.2 (a))
Steering headbearing excessively stiff or notchy (2.2.2 (f) (i))
Rear Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Steering headbearing in such a condition that steering control is adversely affected head bearings (2.2.2 (f) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (1.1.13 (a))
front wheel bearing slight noise
Rear Brake lever has inadequate reserve travel (3.1.3b)
Steering movement excessively 'notchy' with the weight on the lower bearing (2.2.1a)
Steering movement excessively 'notchy' with the wheel raised (2.2.1b)
Oil leak ()
Headlamp aim too low (1.6)
Stop lamp remains on when the brake is released Front brake lever (1.3.1e)
Front Roller brake test indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (3.3.A1d)
Front Wheel alignment slightly misaligned. off centre to steering (2.5.1)
Rear Rear suspension bush deteriorated but not excessively (2.4.A2a(i))
Rear Roller brake test indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (3.3.A1d)
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Rear Lower Rear suspension bush excessively deteriorated engine mount (2.4.A2a(i))
Rear Wheel alignment incorrect which adversely affects the handling (2.5.1)
Front Roller brake test indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (3.3.A1d)
Front Wheel alignment slightly misaligned. off centre to steering (2.5.1)
Rear Roller brake test indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (3.3.A1d)
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Rear Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (4.1.3(ii))
How Reliable is the Piaggio Vespa?
Based on 355,016 MOT tests across 47,189 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
WX61 DDY is a 2012 Piaggio Vespa in Red with a 124cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 20 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 50%.
Across all 2012 Piaggio Vespa models, the average MOT pass rate is 85.8% with a typical mileage of 9,871 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Piaggio Vespa fails its MOT is tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm, accounting for 6,210 recorded failures. If you're considering buying WX61 DDY, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Piaggio Vespa typically stays on UK roads for around 30 years. At 14 years old, this Piaggio Vespa is still in the earlier part of its expected life.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of WX61 DDY?
You can check the full history of WX61 DDY by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was WX61 DDY registered?
WX61 DDY is a 2012 Piaggio Vespa, first registered on 21 January 2012.
Is WX61 DDY safe to buy?
The MOT history for WX61 DDY shows 20 tests with a 50% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does WX61 DDY have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on WX61 DDY. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.