MOT Status
ValidMileage
105,055 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front tyres both over 10 years old
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Crack at lower edge of screen (3.2 (a) (i))
Front Front suspension components have been adapted/modified; Changes appear to have been carried out satisfactorily
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Lower edge of screen cracked (3.2 (a) (i))
Front Front suspension components have been adapted/modified but changes appear to have been carried out satisfactorily
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Crack at lower edge of screen (3.2 (a) (i))
Front Both front tyres over 10 years old according to sidewall date codes
Front Front suspension components have been adapted/modified, but changes appear to have been carried out satisfactorily
Offside Outer Track rod end ball joint has slight play (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view crack at lower edge of screen (3.2 (a) (i))
Front Both front tyres over 10 years old
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view crack at lower edge of screen (3.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Upper Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Small crack at offside of windscreen (3.2 (a) (i))
battery not secured.
crack to bottom of windscreen offside.
damage to front number plate.
Centre Exhaust system not adequately supported (7.1.1)
Front Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)
Nearside Headlamp aim too high (1.8)
Nearside Rear Leaf spring has excessive wear in a shackle pin and/or bush (2.4.B.2)
Offside Front Side repeater not working (1.4.A.2c)
Offside Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Rear fog lamp insecure (1.3.2a)
battery not secured.
crack to bottom of windscreen offside.
damage to front number plate.
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
exhaurst bracket broken
Nearside Front Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Nearside Rear Body has a projection caused by damage (6.1.C.1)
Offside Front Direction indicator obscured more than 50% (1.4.A.2d)
Offside Lower Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Upper Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Rear fog lamp insecure (1.3.2a)
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
exhaurst bracket broken
Nearside Rear Leaf spring has slight wear in a shackle pin and/or bush (2.4.B.2)
Oil leak
slight cracking to side wall front nearside tyre.
Front registration plate letter/figure incomplete (6.3.1c)
Offside Front Direction indicator incomplete (1.5.A1b)
Offside Rear fog lamp missing (1.3.2a)
Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.5b)
Nearside Rear Leaf spring has slight wear in a shackle pin and/or bush (2.4.B.2)
Oil leak
slight cracking to side wall front nearside tyre.
Nearside Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Offside Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Offside Rear Rear fog lamp excessively damaged so that it is not visible from a reasonable distance (1.3.2d)
Offside Rear fog lamp does not face the rear (1.3.2a)
Offside Rear fog lamp excessively deteriorated so that it is not visible from a reasonable distance (1.3.2d)
How Reliable is the Ford Ranger?
Based on 1,687,380 MOT tests across 189,558 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
X109 UCV is a 2000 Ford Ranger in Red with a 2,499cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 16 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 68.8%.
Across all 2000 Ford Ranger models, the average MOT pass rate is 68.4% with a typical mileage of 106,206 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Ford Ranger fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 41,033 recorded failures. If you're considering buying X109 UCV, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Ranger typically stays on UK roads for around 27 years. At 26 years old, this Ford Ranger is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of X109 UCV?
You can check the full history of X109 UCV by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was X109 UCV registered?
X109 UCV is a 2000 Ford Ranger, first registered on 1 September 2000.
Is X109 UCV safe to buy?
The MOT history for X109 UCV shows 16 tests with a 68.8% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does X109 UCV have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on X109 UCV. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.