MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
222,067 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front Subframe mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Direction indicator adversely affected by the operation of another lamp (4.4.3 (b))
Nearside Rear Leaf spring shackle bracket corroded and seriously weakened (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Seat belt anchorage prescribed area strength or continuity significantly reduced inner and outer sill near seat belt runner mountings (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Rear Brakes imbalanced across an axle Axle 2 (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Tyre has a lump, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Front outer sill corroded
Offside Rear Leaf spring shackle bracket corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Position lamp has a product on the lens or light source which obviously reduces light intensity lens discoloured (4.2.3 (b) (i))
Offside Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (4.7.1 (b) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Central stop light not working
Offside Rear Leaf spring deteriorated but not seriously weakened (2.4.B.1a)
Parking brake lever has little reserve travel (3.1.6b)
Nearside Rear Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded inner and outer sill area corroded with-in 300mm of spring mounting (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Steering rack gaiter split (2.2.D.2d)
Central stop light not working
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front outer sill corroded not in prescribed area
Offside Rear Leaf spring deteriorated but not seriously weakened (2.4.B.1a)
Parking brake lever has little reserve travel (3.1.6b)
Central brake light not working
Nearside Rear Leaf spring deteriorated but not seriously weakened (2.4.B.1a)
centre brake light not working
play in inner steering rack jionts
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
centre brake light not working
play in inner steering rack jionts
small split in brake pedal rubber
Nearside Rear position lamp(s) adversely affected by the operation of another lamp (1.1.A.3f)
Nearside Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
small split in brake pedal rubber
Nearside Front Upper Shock absorber has a slightly worn bush (2.7.4)
Nearside Lower Suspension arm ball joint dust cover excessively damaged so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front Upper Shock absorber has a slightly worn bush (2.7.4)
Front Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
Nearside Rear Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Offside Rear Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Service brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Suspension joint offside lower dust cover split/missing
nearside outer handbrake cable corroded
offside outer hanbrake cable corroded
Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
Rear rear brake application uneven (3.7.B.2)
Suspension joint offside lower dust cover split/missing
engine oil leak (leaking onto inner driveshaft gaitor)
nearside outer handbrake cable corroded
no emmision test possible
offside outer hanbrake cable corroded
Nearside Headlamp damaged but light output not reduced (1.7.5a)
not presented with full compliment of seats
Offside rear parking brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.6a)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Service brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Nearside Headlamp damaged but light output not reduced (1.7.5a)
not presented with full compliment of seats
BOTH HANDBRAKE CABLE OUTER CASINGS ARE AGED
Service brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Transmission brake efficiency below requirements (3.8.A.9/10)
rear brake application uneven (3.8.A.5c)
advisories issued with the failure document are advised with the issuing of this MOT certificate
Service brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Transmission brake efficiency below requirements (3.8.A.9/10)
Transmission brake efficiency below requirements (3.8.A.9/10)
Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gasses (6.3.2a)
nail in tread n/s/f tyre
ALL SEAT BELTS AGED †O/S/R STRONG ADVISE ON CONDITION
ALL STEERING + SUSPENSION AGED †
BOTH FRONT LOWER SHOCKER BUSHES ARE WORN
BOTH REAR LIGHTS STILL HAVE SLIGHT BAD EARTHS
N/S/R TYRE WORN ON THE OUTER EDGE
O/S/F WHEEL RIM DAMAGED
Horn does not function (6.2.1b)
Nearside Front Headlamp aim headlamp not in good working order affecting the beam image (1.2.4b)
Nearside Front Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (6.1.3)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Rear Exhaust has a mounting that does not fully support the exhaust system (6.3.1b)
Rear position lamp(s) adversely affected by the operation of another lamp (1.1.4d)
Service brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
ALL REAR SEAT BELTS ARE AGED
ALL STEERING AND SUSPENSION AGED
BOTH FRONT SHOCKER LOWER MOUNTINGS ARE WORN
Offside Rear Seat belt slight fluffing or fraying (5.1.B.3b)
STRONG ADVISE O/S/F WHEEL RIM HASA DAMAGE
How Reliable is the Renault Master?
Based on 1,547,762 MOT tests across 123,092 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
X239 KVN is a 2001 Renault Master in White with a 2,499cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 24 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 54.2%.
Across all 2001 Renault Master models, the average MOT pass rate is 64.8% with a typical mileage of 111,082 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Renault Master fails its MOT is parking brake: efficiency below requirements, accounting for 69,954 recorded failures. If you're considering buying X239 KVN, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Renault Master typically stays on UK roads for around 31 years. At 25 years old, this Renault Master is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of X239 KVN?
You can check the full history of X239 KVN by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was X239 KVN registered?
X239 KVN is a 2001 Renault Master, first registered on 13 February 2001.
Is X239 KVN safe to buy?
The MOT history for X239 KVN shows 24 tests with a 54.2% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does X239 KVN have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on X239 KVN. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.