MOT Status
ValidMileage
122,775 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Exhaust system corroded
Front Both front suspension radius arm bushes perished
Front Track rod end ball joint dust cover damaged or deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt Both Drag link track rod end rubbers perished (2.1.3 (g) (i))
Nearside Front Seat belt webbing slightly damaged or frayed (7.1.2 (b))
Nearside Front Wheel bearing has slight play (5.1.3 (a) (i))
Offside Front Seat belt webbing slightly damaged or frayed (7.1.2 (b))
Offside Front Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Power steering pump has slight seepage (2.1.5 (a))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Both rear discs pitted (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear fog light lens damaged
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Chip in screen (3.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Seat belt webbing slightly damaged or frayed (7.1.2 (b))
Nearside Front Track rod end ball joint dust cover damaged or deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt perishing, furthest forward (2.1.3 (g) (i))
Offside Front Seat belt webbing slightly damaged or frayed (7.1.2 (b))
Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing front tyres cracking (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing rear tyres cracking (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge rear tyres low in tread (5.2.3 (e))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Chip in screen (3.2 (a) (i))
Windscreen wiper blade defective Splitting (3.4 (b) (i))
underside dirty
Nearside Front Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing both rears (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement front trailing arm bushes (5.3.4 (a) (i))
rear crossmember corroded
Offside Front Wheel bearing has excessive play (5.1.3 (a) (i))
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Front Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing both rears (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement front trailing arm bushes (5.3.4 (a) (i))
rear crossmember corroded
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Wheel bearing has slight play (5.1.3 (a) (i))
Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge fronts (5.2.3 (e))
Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (3.5 (a))
Offside Seat belt webbing significantly weakened (7.1.2 (b) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Wheel bearing has slight play (5.1.3 (a) (i))
Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge fronts (5.2.3 (e))
Front Prop shaft joint worn, but not excessively (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Offside Rear Integral body structure or chassis corroded within 30cm of a mounting, but not seriously affecting overall security crossmember (6.2.2 (d) (i))
Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush rears (5.3.2 (c))
Fluid leak harmful to the environment or a risk to other road users (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Headlamp aim too high both fronts (4.1.2 (a))
Horn not working (7.7 (a))
Nearside Seat belt buckle missing (7.1.2 (d))
Brake fluid warning lamp illuminated (1.1.10 (f))
Front Prop shaft joint worn, but not excessively (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Offside Rear Integral body structure or chassis corroded within 30cm of a mounting, but not seriously affecting overall security crossmember (6.2.2 (d) (i))
Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush rears (5.3.2 (c))
Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush rears (5.3.2 (c))
n/s/f outer rigger corroded
Nearside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength suspension cone (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Nearside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush rears (5.3.2 (c))
n/s/f outer rigger corroded
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Offside Front Upper Coil spring mounting corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.C.3c)
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Rear Shock absorber has a slightly worn bush upper bushes (2.7.4)
Brake fluid warning lamp illuminated (3.6.G.2)
Nearside Front Tyre fouling a part of the vehicle (4.1.D.2)
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Rear Shock absorber has a slightly worn bush upper bushes (2.7.4)
Nearside Front Shock absorber has a slightly worn bush (2.7.4)
both front tyres wearign badly on inner edges uneven and perishing
both rear tyre perishing and wearing on inner edges uneven
nearsdie front spring turret corroding
Oil leak
tyres perishing
rear diff leaking oil
Offside Outer Front Seat belt damaged but webbing not significantly weakened (5.2.2a)
Rear Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Seat belt damaged but webbing not significantly weakened (5.2.2a)
Nearside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Offside Seat belt damaged but not affecting the operation of the belt (5.2.2a)
Offside Side repeater not working (1.4.A.2c)
Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
tyres starting to crack
Offside Seat belt damaged but not affecting the operation of the belt (5.2.2a)
tyres starting to crack
How Reliable is the Land Rover Defender?
Based on 2,960,045 MOT tests across 181,953 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
X337 EAL is a 2000 Land Rover Defender in Green with a 2,495cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 26 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 76.9%.
Across all 2000 Land Rover Defender models, the average MOT pass rate is 70.6% with a typical mileage of 100,520 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Land Rover Defender fails its MOT is shock absorber has an excessively worn bush, accounting for 77,499 recorded failures. If you're considering buying X337 EAL, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Land Rover Defender typically stays on UK roads for around 43 years. At 26 years old, this Land Rover Defender is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of X337 EAL?
You can check the full history of X337 EAL by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was X337 EAL registered?
X337 EAL is a 2000 Land Rover Defender, first registered on 1 September 2000.
Is X337 EAL safe to buy?
The MOT history for X337 EAL shows 26 tests with a 76.9% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does X337 EAL have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on X337 EAL. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.