MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
82,744 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush bonding deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Anti-lock braking system warning lamp indicates an ABS fault (3.4.1c)
Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Nearside Body or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings floor (6.1.B.2)
Nearside Inner Body or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings sill (6.1.B.2)
Offside Body or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings floor (6.1.B.2)
Offside Inner Body or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings sill (6.1.B.2)
Offside Outer Body or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings (6.1.B.2)
Rear fog lamp not working (1.3.2b)
Nearside Front Inner Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Inner Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
oil leak
Both rear tyres cracked and perished
Nail in nearside rear tyre
Nail in offside rear tyre
Nearside rear sill has corrosion within nearside rear axle mounting prescribed area but not considered to be excessive
Offside rear sill has corrosion within offside rear axle mounting prescribed area but not considered to be excessive
Oil leak
offside rear brake pipe slightly corroded (side of fuel tank)
Nearside Front Brake hose excessively deteriorated (3.6.B.4d)
Nearside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Front Brake hose excessively deteriorated (3.6.B.4d)
Both rear tyres cracked and perished
Brake hydraulic reservoir fluid close to minimum level (3.6.G.1b)
Centre stop lamp not working
Nail in nearside rear tyre
Nail in offside rear tyre
Nearside rear sill has corrosion within nearside rear axle mounting prescribed area but not considered to be excessive
Offside rear sill has corrosion within offside rear axle mounting prescribed area but not considered to be excessive
Oil leak
offside rear brake pipe slightly corroded (side of fuel tank)
Engine covers fitted obscuring some components in the engine bay
Nearside Front Direction indicator slightly discoloured (1.4.A.2f)
Oil leak
corrosion to the front section of the exhaust
n/s/f lower suspension arm bush splitting
o/s/f lower suspension arm bush separating
slight corrosion to fuel filter
Engine covers fitted obscuring some components in the engine bay
Nearside Front Direction indicator slightly discoloured (1.4.A.2f)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Oil leak
both rear wheel arches slightly corroded
corrosion to chassis
corrosion to exhaust
corrosion to front coil springs
Engine covers fitted obscuring some components in the engine bay
corrosion to chassis
corrosion to front coil springs
corrosion to handbrake cables
corrosion to metal brake pipes
minor blow from exhaust
n/s/f lower suspension arm bush splitting
o/s/f cv boot perishing
o/s/f flexible brake hose perishing
oil leak
small movement in o/s mirror
How Reliable is the Ford Puma?
Based on 713,333 MOT tests across 56,808 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
X347 BFP is a 2000 Ford Puma in Black with a 1,679cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 16 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 75%.
Across all 2000 Ford Puma models, the average MOT pass rate is 67.3% with a typical mileage of 74,235 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Ford Puma fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 62,649 recorded failures. If you're considering buying X347 BFP, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Puma typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 26 years old, this Ford Puma is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of X347 BFP?
You can check the full history of X347 BFP by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was X347 BFP registered?
X347 BFP is a 2000 Ford Puma, first registered on 17 November 2000.
Is X347 BFP safe to buy?
The MOT history for X347 BFP shows 16 tests with a 75% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does X347 BFP have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on X347 BFP. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.