MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
112,507 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Inner Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Nearside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Offside Front front brake binding (3.7.B.1)
Offside Inner Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Rear Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Parking brake: parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
vehicle underside corroded in various areas.
Nearside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Front constant velocity joint gaiter damaged, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.5.C.1a)
Offside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Nearside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front constant velocity joint gaiter damaged, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.5.C.1a)
Offside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Rear Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 10mm circle within zone 'A' (8.3.1a)
centre brake light not working
offside c.v boot suspect pinhole
offside front tyre wearing on inner edge
Nearside Headlamp aim too high and too far to the right. (1.8)
Offside Headlamp aim too high and too far to the left. (1.8)
Rear Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 10mm circle within zone 'A' (8.3.1a)
centre brake light not working
offside c.v boot suspect pinhole
offside front tyre wearing on inner edge
Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Rear Shock absorber has a slightly worn bush (2.7.4)
Rear Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
corrosion formong on both rear sillls/arches and jacking points underneath.
ADDED 0.75 OF ENGINE OIL TO GET OIL INTO LEVEL MARKS
BOTH FRONT BRAKE DISC INNER FACES IN POOR CONDITION
ENGINE WATER LEVEL WAS VERY LOW WHICH I DID TOP UP BUT ANTI FREEZE NEEDS CHECKING AS THERE LOOKS TO BE A WATER LEAK FROM THE ENGINE NEAR THE COIL PACK.
FREED OFF THE BONNET SAFETY CATCH
NSR OUTER SILL IS VERY RUSTY.
REAR EXHAUST BOX IS VERY RUSTY AND HAS STARTED TO BLOW
SCREW IN OSR TYRE TREAD WHICH LOOKS TO BE LEAKING
SLIGHT JUDDER FROM BOTH FRONT BRAKES.
Nearside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
BOTH FRONT DISC INNER FACES IN POOR CONDITION
NS OUTER SILL GOING RUSTY.
NSF TYRE TREAD VERY BADLY WORN ON INNER EDGE AND OSF TYRE TREAD WEARING ON INNER EDGE.
OS DIP BEAM PATTERN POOR.
TRACKING MAY NEED CHECKING IF NOT BE DONE LATERLY
V PULLEY BELT CRACKED.
both front brake discs corroding on inner surfaces
Nearside Headlamp aim too low when the centre of the headlamp is below 850mm from the ground (1.6.B2)
Nearside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Offside Headlamp not in good working order (not working) (1.2.4a)
frt discs corroding
How Reliable is the Ford Puma?
Based on 713,333 MOT tests across 56,808 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
X386 GJM is a 2000 Ford Puma in Black with a 1,679cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 11 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 63.6%.
Across all 2000 Ford Puma models, the average MOT pass rate is 67.3% with a typical mileage of 74,235 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Ford Puma fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 62,649 recorded failures. If you're considering buying X386 GJM, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Puma typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 26 years old, this Ford Puma is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of X386 GJM?
You can check the full history of X386 GJM by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was X386 GJM registered?
X386 GJM is a 2000 Ford Puma, first registered on 21 December 2000.
Is X386 GJM safe to buy?
The MOT history for X386 GJM shows 11 tests with a 63.6% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does X386 GJM have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on X386 GJM. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.