MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
91,089 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
suspension components+exhaust corroding,offside rear tyre wearing on edges getting low on tread,nearside rear+nearside front, tyres wearing on edges
Nearside Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
centre silencer corroding
EML on
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both worn (3.5.1i)
Front coil spring corroded both (2.4.C.1b)
Rear Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured both (1.4.A.2f)
Rear both tyres starting to perish 195/55 R15 V
Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both scored (3.5.1i)
Steering rack gaiter deteriorated both (2.2.D.2d)
Suspension arm ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt both (2.4.G.2)
auxiliary belt perished
exhaust system corroded
general under-body corrosion
Nearside Front Brake hose twisted (found during steering lock to lock check) (2.2.D.2b)
Nearside Inner Rear position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
Offside Front Brake hose excessively deteriorated (3.6.B.4d)
Offside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c) DANGEROUS
EML on
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both worn (3.5.1i)
Front coil spring corroded both (2.4.C.1b)
Rear Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured both (1.4.A.2f)
Rear both tyres starting to perish 195/55 R15 V
Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both scored (3.5.1i)
Steering rack gaiter deteriorated both (2.2.D.2d)
Suspension arm ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt both (2.4.G.2)
auxiliary belt perished
exhaust system corroded
general under-body corrosion
Offside Front Brake hose slightly deteriorated (3.6.B.4d)
Nearside Front Brake hose excessively deteriorated (3.6.B.4d)
Nearside Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
Rear registration plate incorrect (6.3.1a)
Offside Front Brake hose slightly deteriorated (3.6.B.4d)
Offside Rear position lamp(s) has light sources not illuminating, but not more than 50% (1.1.A.3b)
Nearside Front coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
Offside Front coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
Fuel system component insecure (7.2.1)
Nearside Headlamp aim too low (1.8)
Offside Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Nearside Front coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
Offside Front coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
n/s/f tyre worn on outer edge
Nearside Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
n/s/f tyre worn on outer edge
Nearside Rear Upper Radius arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Upper Radius arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Headlamp aim too high (1.8)
Rear registration plate deteriorated (6.3.1d)
Nearside Rear Upper Radius arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Upper Radius arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
How Reliable is the Volvo S40?
Based on 1,390,271 MOT tests across 104,646 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
X388 CCF is a 2000 Volvo S40 in Red with a 1,588cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 20 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 70%.
Across all 2000 Volvo S40 models, the average MOT pass rate is 67.4% with a typical mileage of 86,316 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Volvo S40 fails its MOT is position lamp(s) not working, accounting for 60,127 recorded failures. If you're considering buying X388 CCF, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Volvo S40 typically stays on UK roads for around 30 years. At 26 years old, this Volvo S40 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of X388 CCF?
You can check the full history of X388 CCF by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was X388 CCF registered?
X388 CCF is a 2000 Volvo S40, first registered on 1 September 2000.
Is X388 CCF safe to buy?
The MOT history for X388 CCF shows 20 tests with a 70% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does X388 CCF have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on X388 CCF. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.