MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
187,500 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both (3.5.1i)
all brake discs inner surfaces corroding
exhaust nuts and bolts and also middle box corroding
judder on both front brakes
n/s/f tyre reaching marker bars
o/s/f brake binding
o/s/f indicator starting to show white light
o/s/f tyre reaching marker bars
o/s/r bumper marker light lens cracked
rear brake backing plates corroded
steering wheel cover rough
Nearside Front Brake hose excessively deteriorated (3.6.B.4d)
Offside Front Ball joint has excessive play (2.2.B.1f)
Offside Front Brake hose excessively deteriorated (3.6.B.4d)
all brake discs inner surfaces corroding
exhaust nuts and bolts and also middle box corroding
judder on both front brakes
n/s/f tyre reaching marker bars
o/s/f brake binding
o/s/f indicator starting to show white light
o/s/f tyre reaching marker bars
o/s/r bumper marker light lens cracked
rear brake backing plates corroded
steering wheel cover rough
Both rear brake disc heat shields corroded
Centre exhaust section deteriorated
Nail in nearside front tyre
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Nearside Rear Brake pipe leaking (3.6.A.1) DANGEROUS
Offside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c) DANGEROUS
Both rear brake disc heat shields corroded
Centre exhaust section deteriorated
Nail in nearside front tyre
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Parking brake: parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
both front ball joint boots cracking
both front inner brake pads wearing thin
centre exhaust box deteriorating
rear anti-roll bar bushes deteriorating
rear brake shields corroding
Nearside Track rod end ball joint has excessive play (2.2.B.1f)
both front ball joint boots cracking
both front inner brake pads wearing thin
centre exhaust box deteriorating
rear anti-roll bar bushes deteriorating
rear brake shields corroding
centre exhaust deteriorating
engine management light on
o/s/f anti roll bar link boots split
rear trailing arm link bushes split
slight judder on front brakes
Nearside Rear coil spring fractured (2.4.C.1a)
Offside Rear coil spring fractured (2.4.C.1a)
Parking brake: parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
centre exhaust deteriorating
engine management light on
o/s/f anti roll bar link boots split
rear trailing arm link bushes split
slight judder on front brakes
engine management light on
n/s/r brake binding slightly
o/s/f anti roll bar drop link boot split
rear tyres close to limit
stonechip and marks on o/s windscreen
n/s/f tyre worn to 3mm
o/s/f indicator shows white light
How Reliable is the Volvo S40?
Based on 1,390,271 MOT tests across 104,646 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
X593 TDN is a 2000 Volvo S40 in Silver with a 1,948cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 15 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 73.3%.
Across all 2000 Volvo S40 models, the average MOT pass rate is 67.4% with a typical mileage of 86,316 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Volvo S40 fails its MOT is position lamp(s) not working, accounting for 60,127 recorded failures. If you're considering buying X593 TDN, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Volvo S40 typically stays on UK roads for around 30 years. At 26 years old, this Volvo S40 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of X593 TDN?
You can check the full history of X593 TDN by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was X593 TDN registered?
X593 TDN is a 2000 Volvo S40, first registered on 13 November 2000.
Is X593 TDN safe to buy?
The MOT history for X593 TDN shows 15 tests with a 73.3% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does X593 TDN have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on X593 TDN. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.