MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
109,108 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both front (5.3.4 (a) (i))
fanbelt worn
Offside Rear Stop lamp(s) not working (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both front (5.3.4 (a) (i))
fanbelt worn
front headlamps misty
rear suspension components rusty
Front Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced both sides (1.7.5a)
Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement both sides (2.4.G.2)
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit both sides (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Front Nail in tyre ()
Offside Front driver's seat slightly insure
Offside Rear Nail in tyre ()
Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded both sides (3.6.B.2c)
Rear Radius arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement both sides (2.4.G.2)
top mount slightly stiff both sides front
under vehicle corroded
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick both sides (3.5.1g)
Front Headlamp aim too low both sides (1.8)
Front Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced both sides (1.7.5a)
Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement both sides (2.4.G.2)
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit both sides (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Front Nail in tyre ()
Offside Front driver's seat slightly insure
Offside Rear Nail in tyre ()
Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded both sides (3.6.B.2c)
Rear Radius arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement both sides (2.4.G.2)
top mount slightly stiff both sides front
under vehicle corroded
Rear Stop lamp slightly affected by the operation of another lamp (1.2.1f)
presenter adviced
Front Headlamp aim too low (1.8)
Rear Stop lamp slightly affected by the operation of another lamp (1.2.1f)
presenter adviced
Nearside Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced (1.7.5a)
Nearside Rear Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Track rod end ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.2.C.1c)
Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced (1.7.5a)
both front ABS wiring harness not fully secure but not likely to get damaged
front wipers split but clear windscreen effectively
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced (1.7.5a)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Track rod end ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.2.C.1c)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced (1.7.5a)
n/s/f wiper split but clears screen effectively
o/s/r tyre low on inner edge
rear tyres outer sidewalls cracking
rear tyres stepped on inner edges
Both rear tyres cracked and perishing.
Both rear tyres wearing unevenly on the insides.
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front Track rod end ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.2.C.1c)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Track rod end ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.2.C.1c)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Oil leak
Nearside Front Macpherson strut has excessive movement at the upper attachment (2.5.A.1c)
Offside Front Macpherson strut has excessive movement at the upper attachment (2.5.A.1c)
Both rear tyres cracked and perishing.
Both rear tyres wearing unevenly on the insides.
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front Track rod end ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.2.C.1c)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Track rod end ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.2.C.1c)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Oil leak
Both rear tyres starting to crack and perish.
Both rear tyres wearing unevenly on the insides.
Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside front track rod end boot starting to leak some grease.
Nearside Front suspension has slight movement at a wishbone pin or bush (2.5.A.1c)
Offside Front Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Front suspension has slight movement at a wishbone pin or bush (2.5.A.1c)
Child seat fitted not allowing full inspection of adult belt
Nail in nearside rear tyre
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
rear number plate starting to deteriate. n/s/r tyre worn unevenly on edges.
How Reliable is the Honda Jazz?
Based on 5,740,892 MOT tests across 402,952 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
X60 AJP is a 2002 Honda Jazz in Blue with a 1,339cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 21 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 81%.
Across all 2002 Honda Jazz models, the average MOT pass rate is 75.4% with a typical mileage of 68,136 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Honda Jazz fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 57,414 recorded failures. If you're considering buying X60 AJP, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Honda Jazz typically stays on UK roads for around 24 years. At 24 years old, this Honda Jazz is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of X60 AJP?
You can check the full history of X60 AJP by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was X60 AJP registered?
X60 AJP is a 2002 Honda Jazz, first registered on 27 March 2002.
Is X60 AJP safe to buy?
The MOT history for X60 AJP shows 21 tests with a 81% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does X60 AJP have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on X60 AJP. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.