MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
98,716 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Rear tyres cracking and perishing
Front Direction indicator slightly discoloured both (1.4.A.2f)
clutch worn
exhaust heatshield insecure
front pads low
headlights slightly poor condition
n/s/f headlight cracked
o/s door check strap missing
o/s/f tyre close to wear limit
rear fog switch poorly positioned
suspension + underbody corrosion
Brake pipe leaking (3.6.A.1)
Headlamp aim too high both (1.8)
Rear Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
Front Direction indicator slightly discoloured both (1.4.A.2f)
clutch worn
exhaust heatshield insecure
front pads low
n/s/f headlight cracked
o/s door check strap missing
o/s/f tyre close to wear limit
rear fog switch poorly positioned
suspension + underbody corrosion
inner sills corroded
minor play nsf top mount
rear axle bushes perished
Nearside Front Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Rear fog lamp not working (1.3.2b)
Rear fog lamp tell tale not working (1.3.1b)
inner sills corroded
minor play nsf top mount
rear axle bushes perished
rear brake application uneven (3.7.B.2)
Centre Stop lamp not working (1.2.1b)
Front position lamp(s) adversely affected by the operation of another lamp (1.1.A.3f)
Offside Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
Rear Bonded suspension unit deteriorated and cannot function as intended (2.4.F.3)
Rear fog lamp not working (1.3.2b)
Rear fog lamp tell tale not working (1.3.1b)
Windscreen has a sticker or other obstruction encroaching by more than 10mm within zone 'A' (8.3.1b)
both handbrake cabels corroded
fuel filter corroded
nsf headlight lense broken
nsf wishbone bush debonding
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
park brake noisey when applied
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Rear fog lamp not working (1.3.2b)
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
park brake noisey when applied
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front Tyre has ply or cords exposed (4.1.D.1b) DANGEROUS
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
offside rear wheel rim damaged
Child seat fitted not allowing full inspection of adult belt
coolant level just below minimum
osf brake pipe to flexi hose coroding
rear silencer badly coroded and blowing
reat top suspension mounts worn
wipers poor condition and noisey operation
front brake pipe deterioration
rear exhaust box deterioration
Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Nearside Front Radius arm has excessive play in a pin/bush (2.4.G.2)
Front Headlamp aim too high (1.8)
front brake pipe deterioration
rear exhaust box deterioration
Offside Rear Road wheel slightly damaged (4.2.A.1a)
How Reliable is the Ford Puma?
Based on 713,333 MOT tests across 56,808 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
X707 ATF is a 2000 Ford Puma in Grey with a 1,679cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 17 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 64.7%.
Across all 2000 Ford Puma models, the average MOT pass rate is 67.3% with a typical mileage of 74,235 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Ford Puma fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 62,649 recorded failures. If you're considering buying X707 ATF, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Puma typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 26 years old, this Ford Puma is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of X707 ATF?
You can check the full history of X707 ATF by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was X707 ATF registered?
X707 ATF is a 2000 Ford Puma, first registered on 5 October 2000.
Is X707 ATF safe to buy?
The MOT history for X707 ATF shows 17 tests with a 64.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does X707 ATF have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on X707 ATF. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.