MOT Status
ValidMileage
43,839 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Exhaust noisy (8.1.1 (a))
Indicator switch insecure (4.4.2 (a) (i))
Rear Brake indicates excessive fluctuation of brake effort (1.2.1 (e))
Rear Shock absorber has negligible damping effect (5.3.2 (b))
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (5.2.3 (e))
Drive chain slightly loose (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Headlamp aim so that beam "kick up" is not visible on the screen No beam pattern (4.1.2 (a))
Offside Rear Footrest missing (6.2.12 (a))
Stop lamp not working (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
Drive chain slightly loose (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Drive chain slightly tight (6.1.7 (k) (i))
Drive chain sprocket slightly loose Rear sprocket carrier (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (1.1.13 (a))
Plug in rear tyre
Rear Brake indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (1.2.1 (e))
Rear Nail in tyre ()
Suspension arm pin, bush or joint worn but not resulting in excessive movement Swinging arm pivot (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Chain guard insecure (6.1.7 (i))
Offside Front Shock absorber has a serious fluid leak (5.3.2 (b))
Drive chain slightly tight (6.1.7 (k) (i))
Drive chain sprocket slightly loose Play rear sprocket carrier (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Exhaust noisy (8.1.1 (a))
Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (1.1.13 (a))
Nearside Front Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (5.3.2 (b))
Rear Brake indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (1.2.1 (e))
Rear Nail in tyre ()
Suspension pin, bush or joint worn but not resulting in excessive movement Swinging arm pivot (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Roller brake test indicates a slightly juddering brake (3.3.A1b)
Drive chain slightly loose (6.2.1d)
all rear shock absorbers mounting bushes are worn to excess.
headrace bearings are worn slightly notchy.
rear brake application is slightly creaking.
Exhaust noise is clearly in excess of that emitted by a similar motor bicycle fitted with a standard silencer in average condition (7.1.2)
Front Roller brake test indicates brake effort fall disproportional to brake lever or pedal effort (3.3.A1c)
Roller brake test The less effective brake control does not achieve an efficiency of 25%. (3.3.A2b)
front caliper shim incorrectley fitted
Rear Tyre has ply or cord exposed (4.1.2a(iii)
Rear Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (4.1.3(ii))
Headlamp aim too low (1.6)
front brake slightly spongy
Rear Roller brake test indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (3.3.A1d)
Steering movement slightly 'notchy' (2.2.1a)
How Reliable is the Kawasaki ER5?
Based on 65,763 MOT tests across 6,087 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
X778 NFC is a 2000 Kawasaki ER5 in Black with a 498cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 19 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 73.7%.
Across all 2000 Kawasaki ER5 models, the average MOT pass rate is 81.4% with a typical mileage of 22,632 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Kawasaki ER5 fails its MOT is tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm, accounting for 1,027 recorded failures. If you're considering buying X778 NFC, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Kawasaki ER5 typically stays on UK roads for around 30 years. At 26 years old, this Kawasaki ER5 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of X778 NFC?
You can check the full history of X778 NFC by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was X778 NFC registered?
X778 NFC is a 2000 Kawasaki ER5, first registered on 25 October 2000.
Is X778 NFC safe to buy?
The MOT history for X778 NFC shows 19 tests with a 73.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does X778 NFC have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on X778 NFC. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.