MOT Status
ValidMileage
100,574 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Parking brake efficiency less than 50% of the required value (1.4.2 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Headlamp reflector slightly defective both , images weakened (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush quite bad (5.3.2 (c))
Parking brake lever defective but can be satisfactorily operated travel high (1.1.6 (d))
Power steering component has slight seepage from a component rack (2.1.5 (a))
Supplementary restraint system warning lamp does not illuminate (7.1.6 (a))
park brake efficiency near weak,minimum
Front Hydraulic leak, but not excessive steering rack (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Front Seat belt buckle slightly damaged n/s and o/s (7.1.2 (d))
Offside Rear Seat belt buckle slightly damaged (7.1.2 (d))
Rear Parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (1.4.2 (a) (i))
slight weep from power steering pipe
Power steering pipe/hose has slight seepage (2.1.5 (a))
Both offside rear shock absorbers has slight play in there upper support mounts.
Power steering pipe(s) or hose(s) has slight seepage from a joint (2.3.3b)
Main beam 'tell-tale' not working (1.7.4c)
Nearside Front Brakes imbalanced across an axle (3.7.B.5b)
Nearside Front Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
Nearside Front front brake binding (3.7.B.1)
Nearside Headlamp not working on main beam (1.7.5a)
Nearside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Headlamp not working on main beam (1.7.5a)
Offside Rear front brake binding (3.7.B.1)
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Anti-roll bar rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Rear position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
Offside Rear Stop lamp not working (1.2.1b)
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Anti-roll bar rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Front Headlamp not working on dipped beam (1.7.5a)
Nearside Front Headlamp not working on main beam (1.7.5a)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nail in offside front tyre
nearside front and offside rear stalk covers damaged
nearside mirror loose
nearside rear tyre worn from edges
bothside mirrors loose
bothside rear tyres worn from edges
front brake pads worn
Power steering component(s) has slight seepage from a component (2.3.3b)
o/s front wishbone inner bush worn
o/s rear o/s front tyres worn on inside
Power steering pipe(s) or hose(s) has slight seepage (2.3.3b)
How Reliable is the Jaguar Xjs?
Based on 127,020 MOT tests across 12,009 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
XIB 6424 is a 1992 Jaguar Xjs in Red with a 3,980cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 22 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 81.8%.
Across all 1992 Jaguar Xjs models, the average MOT pass rate is 71.7% with a typical mileage of 90,655 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Jaguar Xjs fails its MOT is parking brake: efficiency below requirements, accounting for 5,735 recorded failures. If you're considering buying XIB 6424, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Jaguar Xjs typically stays on UK roads for around 44 years. At 34 years old, this Jaguar Xjs is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of XIB 6424?
You can check the full history of XIB 6424 by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was XIB 6424 registered?
XIB 6424 is a 1992 Jaguar Xjs, first registered on 30 December 1992.
Is XIB 6424 safe to buy?
The MOT history for XIB 6424 shows 22 tests with a 81.8% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does XIB 6424 have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on XIB 6424. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.