MOT Status
ValidMileage
111,978 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Front Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (6.1.2 (a))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Prop shaft bearing has slight play (6.1.7 (b) (i))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material all (1.1.11 (c))
Central Prop shaft bearing has slight play (6.1.7 (b) (i))
Front Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (6.1.2 (a))
Front Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output Both (4.1.4 (b))
Nearside Front Position lamp light intensity obviously reduced (4.2.3 (a) (i))
Offside Front Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Outer sill (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Position lamp light intensity obviously reduced (4.2.3 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Shock absorbers has light misting of oil (5.3.2 (b))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced General corrosion to all chassis and suspension components (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Offside Fuel Pipe/s corroded ()
Offside Rear Lower Body panel slightly loose Lower retaining strap broken (6.2.1 (a) (i))
Rear Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Slight play in front prop shaft u/j
Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened Both front uppers (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Integral body structure or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of a body mounting Both rear outer body mounts (6.2.2 (d) (i))
Nearside Rear Vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced Inner chassis (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Upper Brake hose ferrule excessively corroded (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Suspension spring mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength Both rear upper (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Lower Body panel slightly loose Lower retaining strap broken (6.2.1 (a) (i))
Slight play in front prop shaft u/j
Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened Both front uppers (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material Both front inners (1.1.11 (c))
Rear Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Slight play in front prop shaft u/j
Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened Both front upper arms heavily corroded (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Rear upper chassis heavily corroded (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar linkage insecurely attached (5.3.3 (a) (i))
Service brake grabbing severely (1.2.1 (c))
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material Both front inners (1.1.11 (c))
Rear Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Slight play in front prop shaft u/j
Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened Both front upper arms heavily corroded (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Rear upper chassis heavily corroded (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material Both front inners (1.1.11 (c))
Nearside front tyre wearing on outer edge
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Rear chasis (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material Both front inners (1.1.11 (c))
Nearside front tyre wearing on outer edge
Supplementary restraint system warning lamp indicates a fault (7.1.6 (a))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Rear chasis (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Light corrosion on rear chasis
Headlamp aim beam image obviously incorrect (1.8.A.1b)
Light corrosion on rear chasis
Both rear tyre valves slightly delaminated
Light corrosion on rear inner upper chasis
Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
Headlamp aim too high Both (1.8)
both front tyres 3-4mm of tread approx
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
fluctuation from front brakes
Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Brakes imbalanced across an axle (3.7.B.5b)
Exhaust system not adequately supported (7.1.1)
Offside Rear fog lamp not working (1.3.2b)
Offside front brake binding (3.7.B.1)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
rear pipes slightly corroded
Offside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Nearside Headlamp aim too high (1.8)
Offside Headlamp aim too high (1.8)
Front brake disc slightly pitted (3.5.1h)
Nail in offside rear tyre
Nearside Front Headlamp aim too high (1.8)
Offside Front Headlamp aim too high (1.8)
Front brake disc slightly pitted (3.5.1h)
Nail in offside rear tyre
How Reliable is the Nissan D22?
Based on 72,056 MOT tests across 5,277 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
XUL 764 is a 2004 Nissan D22 in Red with a 2,488cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 28 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 71.4%.
Across all 2004 Nissan D22 models, the average MOT pass rate is 73.4% with a typical mileage of 81,589 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Nissan D22 fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 3,884 recorded failures. If you're considering buying XUL 764, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Nissan D22 typically stays on UK roads for around 27 years. At 22 years old, this Nissan D22 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of XUL 764?
You can check the full history of XUL 764 by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was XUL 764 registered?
XUL 764 is a 2004 Nissan D22, first registered on 16 January 2004.
Is XUL 764 safe to buy?
The MOT history for XUL 764 shows 28 tests with a 71.4% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does XUL 764 have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on XUL 764. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.