MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
125,240 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrules (3.6.B.4e)
Corrosion on most none prescribed areas
Corrosion on nearside and offside outer rear wheel arches and on nearside and offside sill edges
Front Lower Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (2.4.A.3)
Hole on nearside outer sill which looks like a gromet is missing it is also corroded
Macpherson strut corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside and offside front brake discs are verry rusty and worn
Offside Front coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
Plastic trims/guards and shields are covering some prescribed areas
Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (2.4.A.3)
Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.2.6)
Offside Front Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Nearside Brake hose excessively damaged (3.6.B.4d) DANGEROUS
Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrules (3.6.B.4e)
Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.5b)
Corrosion on most none prescribed areas
Corrosion on nearside and offside outer rear wheel arches and on nearside and offside sill edges
Front Lower Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (2.4.A.3)
Hole on nearside outer sill which looks like a gromet is missing it is also corroded
Macpherson strut corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside and offside front brake discs are verry rusty and worn
Offside Front coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
Plastic trims/guards and shields are covering some prescribed areas
Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (2.4.A.3)
Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.2.6)
o/s & n/s front discs slight wear
o/s &n/s stepsill slight corrosion
Oil leak
front brake discs worn
front no.plate cracked
ns mirror missiing
vehicles underbody rusted
engine oil leak
front no.plate cracked
Anti-lock braking system warning lamp indicates an ABS fault (3.4.1c)
Front brake disc in such a condition that it is seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
engine oil leak
front no.plate cracked
fr4ont no plate † †engine oil leak † †spare wheel loose † †both front tyres close to limit † †nsf strut top mount has slight play
Rear Macpherson strut has excessive movement at the upper attachment (2.5.A.1c)
front no.plate † †engine oilleak † †spare wheel loose † †both front tyres close to legal limit † †nsf strut top mount has very slight play starting
Nearside Front Bonded suspension unit bonding failed and part of unit is likely to become displaced (2.4.F.2)
Offside Front Bonded suspension unit bonding failed and part of unit is likely to become displaced (2.4.F.2)
front number plate is cracked
How Reliable is the Ford Puma?
Based on 713,333 MOT tests across 56,808 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Y379 JHB is a 2001 Ford Puma in Silver with a 1,679cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 10 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 60%.
Across all 2001 Ford Puma models, the average MOT pass rate is 68.8% with a typical mileage of 69,595 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Ford Puma fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 62,649 recorded failures. If you're considering buying Y379 JHB, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Puma typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 25 years old, this Ford Puma is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of Y379 JHB?
You can check the full history of Y379 JHB by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was Y379 JHB registered?
Y379 JHB is a 2001 Ford Puma, first registered on 22 June 2001.
Is Y379 JHB safe to buy?
The MOT history for Y379 JHB shows 10 tests with a 60% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does Y379 JHB have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on Y379 JHB. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.