MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
17,062 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (5.3.2 (b))
Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (1.1.13 (a))
Nearside Lower Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Lower Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Suspension arm corroded and seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Lower Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Frame rail has slight corrosion (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Lower Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Frame rail has slight corrosion (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Lower Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Frame rail has corrosion (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Front Lower Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Frame rail has corrosion (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened Swingarm has corrosion to underside (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Horn control insecure left switch unit not pegged to handlebars (7.7 (b))
Nearside Front Lower Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced frame has corrosion (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Front bolt missing from front mudguard mounting
Nearside Rear Drive chain slightly loose (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Nearside Rear Lower Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened swing arm has corrosion to nearside & underside (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Lower Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced frame rail has corrosion (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Rear Drive chain horseshoe locking device incorrectly fitted (6.1.7 (j) (i))
Nearside Front Horn control insecure left switch unit not pegged to handlebars (7.7 (b))
Nearside Front Lower Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced frame has corrosion (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Front bolt missing from front mudguard mounting
Nearside Rear Drive chain slightly loose (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Nearside Rear Lower Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened swing arm has corrosion to nearside & underside (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Lower Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced frame rail has corrosion (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Front Brake fluid contaminated (1.8 (a))
Front Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Rear Stop lamp switch does not operate in accordance with the requirements (4.3.2 (a) (i))
Brake locking device missing on brake reaction bracket (3.2.A1e)
Rear Roller brake test indicates a sticking brake (3.3.A1a)
Front suspension has slight stiffness in the movement of the suspension. (2.3.6b)
Front Brake disc(s) has slight run out (3.2.A1m)
Front shock absorber has light misting of stanchion (2.3.3)
Front suspension has slight stiffness in the movement of the suspension. (2.3.6b)
Wheel alignment slightly misaligned. (2.5.1)
Rear Roller brake test indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (3.3.A1d)
Engine covered in oil
Rear wheel covered in oil
Drive chain worn but not considered excessive (6.2.1e)
Headlamp aim too high (1.6)
Rear Brake linkage has abnormal movement due to maladjustment (3.2.A1i)
Front Brake lever is positioned so that the brake cannot be readily applied (3.1.3c) DANGEROUS
Rear Brake pedal is bent and the brake cannot be readily applied (3.1.3c) DANGEROUS
Drive chain worn but not considered excessive (6.2.1e)
Brake pedal is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Drive chain slightly loose (6.2.1d)
Oil leak
Rear shock absorber has a light misting (2.4.A.1c)
Rear spring corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4A1b(ii))
Wheel spoke slightly corroded. (4.2.1b)
Drive chain worn but not considered excessive (6.2.1e)
Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (3.2.A1f(i))
Front wheel bearings have excessive free play (2.3.5b)
Rear Stop lamp does not illuminate immediately a brake applies (1.3.1a)
Drive chain worn but not considered excessive (6.2.1e)
Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (3.2.A1f(i))
Rear Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (4.1.3(ii))
Front Roller brake test indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (3.3.A1d)
Rear Drive chain sprocket slightly worn (6.2.1e)
Exhaust has part of the system missing (7.1.1a)
Exhaust noise is clearly in excess of that emitted by a similar motor bicycle fitted with a standard silencer in average condition (7.1.2)
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.2.A1f(i))
Front Stop lamp does not illuminate immediately a brake applies (1.3.1a)
Nearside Front Footrest insecure (6.2.1a)
Rear Brake pedal has inadequate reserve travel (3.1.3b)
Rear Stop lamp does not illuminate immediately a brake applies (1.3.1a)
Steering movement excessively 'notchy' with the wheel raised (2.2.1b)
Drive chain excessively loose (6.2.1d) DANGEROUS
Front Roller brake test indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (3.3.A1d)
Rear Drive chain sprocket slightly worn (6.2.1e)
How Reliable is the Honda VT125C?
Based on 15,200 MOT tests across 1,388 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Y469 SNE is a 2001 Honda VT125C in Silver with a 124cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 27 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 70.4%.
Across all 2001 Honda VT125C models, the average MOT pass rate is 72.6% with a typical mileage of 15,931 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Honda VT125C fails its MOT is tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm, accounting for 446 recorded failures. If you're considering buying Y469 SNE, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Honda VT125C typically stays on UK roads for around 27 years. At 25 years old, this Honda VT125C is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of Y469 SNE?
You can check the full history of Y469 SNE by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was Y469 SNE registered?
Y469 SNE is a 2001 Honda VT125C, first registered on 3 August 2001.
Is Y469 SNE safe to buy?
The MOT history for Y469 SNE shows 27 tests with a 70.4% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does Y469 SNE have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on Y469 SNE. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.