MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
77,358 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Nearside Rear coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
Offside Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Offside Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Offside Rear coil spring worn (2.4.C.1b)
Rear Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
all coil springs corroded
Front Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Nearside Front tyre is 13 years old
Nearside Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Nearside Rear coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
Nearside Rear tyre has age related cracks 2005
Offside Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Offside Rear coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
Rear Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Engine covers fitted obscuring some components in the engine bay
Nearside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Offside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Rear Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
damage to offside front wing
front suspension arms corroded
rear coil springs corroded
rear suspension arms corroded
Engine covers fitted obscuring some components in the engine bay
Front Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.5b)
Nearside Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Offside Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Rear Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
body sill covers fitted
damage to offside front wing
front brake discs corroded
nearside rear tyre 9 years old
nearside rear tyre age cracked
rear coil springs corroded
damage to front bumper
damage to offside front wing
Engine covers fitted obscuring some components in the engine bay
body sill covers fitted
Offside Rear Tyre not fitted in accordance with side wall instructions (4.1.D.1f)
Engine covers fitted obscuring some components in the engine bay
body sill covers fitted
damage to front bumper
damage to offside front wing
Nail in offside rear tyre
both front tyres wearing low close to limit
corrosion to front and rear suspension components
exhaust corroded
Nail in offside rear tyre
Nearside Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
both front tyres wearing low close to limit
corrosion to front and rear suspension components
exhaust corroded
damage to osf wing
Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.5.1g)
Coolant leak
damage to osf wing
rear disks worn and corroded
Exhaust has part of the system slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
Front brake discs corroded
General corrosion to all suspension components
High parking brake travel
Nail in offside rear tyre
O/s/r brake disc heavily pitted, requires attention a.s.a.p
Offside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Small chips in windscreen
Exhaust has part of the system slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
Front brake discs corroded
General corrosion to all suspension components
High parking brake travel
Nail in offside rear tyre
O/s/r brake disc heavily pitted, requires attention a.s.a.p
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Small chips in windscreen
Exhaust has part of the system slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
Inner Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Rear Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
outer sills covered
stone chips in windscreen
Exhaust has part of the system slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
Inner Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Nearside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Rear Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
outer sills covered
stone chips in windscreen
Exhaust has part of the system slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
Front Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
high handbrake travel
sills covered by trims
unable to check hydrolics due to weather conditions
Exhaust has part of the system slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
Inner Rear brake disc slightly scored (3.5.1h)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Front brake disc excessively scored (3.5.1h)
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
deep cuts to treads of front tyres
high handbrake travel
uneven wear to rear tyres
How Reliable is the Toyota Celica?
Based on 870,417 MOT tests across 67,994 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Y671 UOW is a 2001 Toyota Celica in Silver with a 1,794cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 18 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 66.7%.
Across all 2001 Toyota Celica models, the average MOT pass rate is 73.0% with a typical mileage of 90,977 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Toyota Celica fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 43,337 recorded failures. If you're considering buying Y671 UOW, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Toyota Celica typically stays on UK roads for around 36 years. At 25 years old, this Toyota Celica is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of Y671 UOW?
You can check the full history of Y671 UOW by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was Y671 UOW registered?
Y671 UOW is a 2001 Toyota Celica, first registered on 1 April 2001.
Is Y671 UOW safe to buy?
The MOT history for Y671 UOW shows 18 tests with a 66.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does Y671 UOW have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on Y671 UOW. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.