MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
104,291 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Nearside Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Windscreen wiper blade defective (3.4 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Nearside Rear Shock absorbers light misting of oil or has limited damping effect (5.3.2 (b))
Offside Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Offside Front Windscreen wiper blade defective (3.4 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
general under body and component surface corrosion
headlamp lenses deteriorated defusing beam patterns
Nearside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Direction indicator incorrect colour (4.4.3 (a))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Nearside Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Windscreen wiper blade defective (3.4 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Offside Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Offside Front Windscreen wiper blade defective (3.4 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
general under body and component surface corrosion
headlamp lenses deteriorated defusing beam patterns
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
both floors. chassis rails and under sills slightly corroded
front number plate slightly dasmaged
Anti-roll bar linkage pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both rear (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases centre joint (6.1.2 (a))
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect both (4.1.2 (c))
Offside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength chassis rail by subframe (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Electrical wiring likely to touch hot or rotating parts both front earth straps (4.11 (a) (iii)) DANGEROUS
Anti-roll bar linkage pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both rear (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases centre joint (6.1.2 (a))
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output both (4.1.4 (b))
Direction indicator slightly discoloured both front (4.4.3 (a))
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement back bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Brake fluid contaminated (1.8 (a))
Brake pipe excessively corroded both rear (1.1.11 (c))
Direction indicator slightly discoloured both front (4.4.3 (a))
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement back bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
both front suspension arm back bushes starting to unbond
both rear anti roll D bushes have slight play
both rear metal brake pipes slightly corroded
front subframe slightly corroded
front to centre and centre to rear exhaust joint has slight blow
offside front chassis rail slightly corroded
Front registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Nearside Front Track rod end ball joint has slight play (2.2.B.1f)
Offside Front Track rod end ball joint has slight play (2.2.B.1f)
centre to rear exhaust has a slight blow
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Track rod end ball joint has slight play (2.2.B.1f)
Offside Front Suspension arm ball joint dust cover excessively deteriorated so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Track rod end ball joint has slight play (2.2.B.1f)
Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Rear Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrules (3.6.B.4e)
Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Headlamp masks/converters fitted
earth straps on front scocks noted broken
front brake pads noted 60% worn aprox
front no plate noted slightly damaged
inner edge of both rear disc noted corride maby noisy when braking
l/d headlamps fitted pattern poor
slight engine oil leak noted from sump area
Nearside Headlamp aim too low (1.8)
Offside Headlamp aim too high (1.8)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
earth straps on front scocks noted broken
front brake pads noted 60% worn aprox
front no plate noted slightly damaged
inner edge of both rear disc noted corride maby noisy when braking
slight engine oil leak noted from sump area
Headlamp masks/converters fitted
Offside Headlamp aim too low (1.8)
Offside Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced (1.7.5a)
exhaust very rusty
f/n/s tyre worn to 3 mm
f/o/s tyre worn to 4 mm
front discs badly worn inner face
headlamp pattern poor
lhd headlamps fitted
Headlamp masks/converters fitted
Offside Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced (1.7.5a)
exhaust very rusty
f/n/s tyre worn to 3 mm
f/o/s tyre worn to 4 mm
front discs badly worn inner face
headlamp pattern poor
lhd headlamps fitted
Headlamp masks/converters fitted
Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
exhaust rusty esp rear box
front discs badly worn
front tyres 70% worn
headlamp pattern poor
oil leak
rear discs poor at inner edge
spare wheel lose in carrier
both front lower suspension arm inner rear bushes starting to perish
exhaust system noted rusty in places
front brake imbalance
possible slight slackness in the o/s steering arm/ram
slight oil leak noted from the engine
slight wear noted on both front brake disc
wear noted on both rear brake disc
Headlamp masks/converters fitted
Nail in offside rear tyre
both anti roll bars rusty at inner mountings, may be noisey ?
slight play noted in r/o/s hub
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar attachment bracket/mounting insecure (2.4.G.1)
Offside Headlamp aim beam image kick up to the offside (1.6.B1)
exhaust very rusty
How Reliable is the Chrysler Pt Cruiser?
Based on 279,642 MOT tests across 18,504 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Y696 TFG is a 2001 Chrysler Pt Cruiser in Black with a 1,996cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 23 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 69.6%.
Across all 2001 Chrysler Pt Cruiser models, the average MOT pass rate is 68.0% with a typical mileage of 73,288 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Chrysler Pt Cruiser fails its MOT is suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement, accounting for 18,061 recorded failures. If you're considering buying Y696 TFG, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Chrysler Pt Cruiser typically stays on UK roads for around 26 years. At 25 years old, this Chrysler Pt Cruiser is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of Y696 TFG?
You can check the full history of Y696 TFG by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was Y696 TFG registered?
Y696 TFG is a 2001 Chrysler Pt Cruiser, first registered on 31 December 2001.
Is Y696 TFG safe to buy?
The MOT history for Y696 TFG shows 23 tests with a 69.6% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does Y696 TFG have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on Y696 TFG. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.