MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
80,374 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Registration plate does not conform to the specified requirements (0.1 (d))
Nearside Front Brake disc significantly and obviously worn (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Offside Front Brake disc significantly and obviously worn (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength Outer sill panel (marked in yellow) (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Rear Registration plate does not conform to the specified requirements (0.1 (d))
Engine management warning light on
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (4.7.1 (b) (i))
Power steering slightly stiff and rough
Rear seats not fitted at time of testing
Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively Both (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Front Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule Both (1.1.12 (f) (i))
MIL lamp illuminated
Parking brake only just meets minimum requirement Offside low reading
Nearside Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Headlamp lens slightly defective (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Offside Headlamp lens slightly defective (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Rear Exhaust heat shield slightly insecure
Rear Passenger seat(s) missing at time of test ()
Nearside Front Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced (1.7.5a)
Nearside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Offside Front Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced (1.7.5a)
Offside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Play in steering rack inner joint(s) ()
both front coil springs corroded
both rear leaf spring bush perished and cracked
centre exhaust heat shield insecure
parking brake efficiency only just met minimum requirement
rear seats removed at time of test
Play in steering rack inner joint(s) ()
battery slightly loose but still secure
parking brake efficiency only just met minimum requirement
rear seats removed at time of test
Offside Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
upper addtional stop light not working
upper addtional stop light not working
all rear passenger seats was not fitted at time of test
heavy condensation in LH headlamp
slight degradation of rear number plate
Nearside Rear rear brake binding (3.7.B.1)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Only 3 seats installed in vehicle at time of testing
Rear number plate deterioating
Offside Rear Tyre has a bulge, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (4.1.D.1b)
Offside Rear Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (4.1.D.1a) DANGEROUS
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.2b)
Only 3 seats installed in vehicle at time of testing
Rear number plate deterioating
front pads getting low
Rear seats not fitted at time of test.Belts fixing not checked.
Parking brake: parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
Nearside Rear Tyre has a bulge, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (4.1.D.1b)
Front brake imbalance on legal limit 25%
Offside middle seat not fitted
Rear spring shackle bushes worn
Rear tyres perished
Rear wiperblade in poor condition
How Reliable is the Chrysler Grand Voyager?
Based on 387,238 MOT tests across 25,998 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Y828 TGP is a 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager in Blue with a 3,301cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 22 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 77.3%.
Across all 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager models, the average MOT pass rate is 67.4% with a typical mileage of 93,953 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Chrysler Grand Voyager fails its MOT is parking brake: efficiency below requirements, accounting for 26,896 recorded failures. If you're considering buying Y828 TGP, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Chrysler Grand Voyager typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 25 years old, this Chrysler Grand Voyager is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of Y828 TGP?
You can check the full history of Y828 TGP by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was Y828 TGP registered?
Y828 TGP is a 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager, first registered on 22 May 2001.
Is Y828 TGP safe to buy?
The MOT history for Y828 TGP shows 22 tests with a 77.3% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does Y828 TGP have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on Y828 TGP. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.