MOT Status
ValidMileage
255,675 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Front tyres 3mm also low on inner
Offside Front Lower headlight insecure.aim ok
Offside Front body damage
Offside Front steering rack boot rolled back but not split
Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (1.1.13 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Front tyres 3mm also low on inner
Nearside Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (4.7.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Lower headlight insecure.aim ok
Offside Front body damage
Offside Front steering rack boot rolled back but not split
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin BOTH (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Oil leak, but not excessive INNER DRIVE SHAFT SEAL (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Inner Steering rack gaiter missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.1.3 (g) (ii))
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin BOTH (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Oil leak, but not excessive INNER DRIVE SHAFT SEAL (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Brake disc worn, but not excessively both (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Central Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread DAMAGE (0.1 (b))
Offside Front Steering rack gaiter damaged or deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.1.3 (g) (i))
Front Headlamp aim too low both (4.1.2 (a))
Offside Front Steering rack gaiter missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.1.3 (g) (ii))
Nearside Front Bonnet seriously at risk of opening inadvertently (3.1 (b) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Brake disc worn, but not excessively both (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Central Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread DAMAGE (0.1 (b))
Offside Front Steering rack gaiter damaged or deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.1.3 (g) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Engine MIL inoperative or indicates a malfunction (8.2.2.2 (g))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Inner Steering rack gaiter missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.1.3 (g) (ii))
Offside Front Inner Steering rack gaiter missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.1.3 (g) (ii))
windscreen cracked
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
BOTH REAR TYRES OUT OF SHAPE ON INNER EDGE
DASH DISPLAY SERVICE INDICATOR
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Outer Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated SLIGHT GREASE LEAK (6.1.7 (g) (i))
BOTH REAR TYRES OUT OF SHAPE ON INNER EDGE
DASH DISPLAY SERVICE INDICATOR
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Front Headlamp aim too high BOTH LAMPS (4.1.2 (a))
Offside Front Outer Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated SLIGHT GREASE LEAK (6.1.7 (g) (i))
Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
How Reliable is the Volvo XC60?
Based on 944,286 MOT tests across 100,002 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
YF62 CWO is a 2012 Volvo XC60 in Black with a 1,984cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 16 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 62.5%.
Across all 2012 Volvo XC60 models, the average MOT pass rate is 79.7% with a typical mileage of 81,408 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Volvo XC60 fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 4,822 recorded failures. If you're considering buying YF62 CWO, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Volvo XC60 typically stays on UK roads for around 17 years. At 14 years old, this Volvo XC60 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of YF62 CWO?
You can check the full history of YF62 CWO by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was YF62 CWO registered?
YF62 CWO is a 2012 Volvo XC60, first registered on 19 December 2012.
Is YF62 CWO safe to buy?
The MOT history for YF62 CWO shows 16 tests with a 62.5% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does YF62 CWO have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on YF62 CWO. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.