MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
100,441 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement both front lower arms rear support bushes unbonded / split (2.4.G.2)
Rear Brake hose ferrule excessively corroded both rear flexi hoses metal unions corroded to excess (3.6.B.4e)
Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded excessive corrosion through out under side of vehicle / holed to excess (5.2.6) DANGEROUS
Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded excessive corrosion through out underside of vehicle holed to excess (2.4.A.3) DANGEROUS
all steering / suspension / braking components showing corrosion
front brake discs corroded on edges / encroaching onto inner braking surface
underseal split / flaking off allowing water ingress underside corroded
underside / panelling all areas corroded excessive corrosion through out underside
18% imbalance front brakes
Nearside Front Brake hose slightly deteriorated (3.6.B.4d)
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement rear bush (2.4.G.2)
n.s.r. tyrer cracking
o.s.f. seat belt getting slow to retract
play o.s.f. strut top bush when jacked up
slight binding o.s.f. brake
small split n.s. wiper blade
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
small splits in n.s.r. tyre side wall
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
both front and n.s.r. brakes rubbing
fuel filter rusty
imbalance rear brakes
inner face of front brake discs in poor condition
o.s.r. foot brake effort getting low
Nearside Rear Shock absorber has a serious fluid leak (2.7.3)
Offside Front Suspension arm rubber mounting deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front coil spring fractured (2.4.C.1a)
Offside Front Brake hose slightly deteriorated (3.6.B.4d)
centre stop light out
Nearside Rear Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Macpherson strut has slight movement at the upper attachment (2.5.A.1c)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
How Reliable is the Ford Puma?
Based on 713,333 MOT tests across 56,808 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
YK51 CDC is a 2002 Ford Puma in Silver with a 1,679cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 13 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 76.9%.
Across all 2002 Ford Puma models, the average MOT pass rate is 71.0% with a typical mileage of 65,164 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Ford Puma fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 62,649 recorded failures. If you're considering buying YK51 CDC, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Puma typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 24 years old, this Ford Puma is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of YK51 CDC?
You can check the full history of YK51 CDC by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was YK51 CDC registered?
YK51 CDC is a 2002 Ford Puma, first registered on 10 February 2002.
Is YK51 CDC safe to buy?
The MOT history for YK51 CDC shows 13 tests with a 76.9% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does YK51 CDC have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on YK51 CDC. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.