MOT Status
ValidMileage
127,219 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (6.1.2 (a))
Offside Rear Tyre has a cut but not deep enough to reach the ply or cords (5.2.3 (d) (i))
Central Rear Seat belt buckle missing (7.1.2 (d))
Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect both (4.1.2 (c))
Nearside Rear Seat belt buckle missing (7.1.2 (d))
Nearside Rear Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (5.2.3 (d) (i))
Offside Rear Seat belt buckle missing (7.1.2 (d))
Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (6.1.2 (a))
Offside Rear Tyre has a cut but not deep enough to reach the ply or cords (5.2.3 (d) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
exhaust corroded and slight blow
headlamp lenses discoloured
Offside Front Anti-roll bar ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
exhaust corroded and slight blow
front tyres wearing low
headlamp lenses discoloured
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
exhaust corroded
Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect both front (4.1.2 (c))
Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively both front (3.4 (b) (ii))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
exhaust corroded
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
exhaust corroded
headlamp lesnes discolouring
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (5.3.4 (b) (ii))
Offside Front Anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (5.3.4 (b) (ii))
Offside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
exhaust corroded
headlamp lesnes discolouring
rear wiper blade rubber missing
rear wiper blade split
Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect both front (4.1.2 (c))
Nearside Front Service brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
rear wiper blade split
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
exhaust deteriorating
headlamp lenses discolouring
n/s/f tyre on limit
spare tyre flat and perished
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
exhaust deteriorating
n/s/f tyre wearing low
spare tyre perished
Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect both front (4.1.2 (c))
Nearside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
exhaust deteriorating
n/s/f tyre wearing low
spare tyre perished
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
chips in front windscreen
drivers door check strap worn
exhaust deteriorating
headlamp lenses discolouring
rear tyres perishing
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively both front (3.4 (b) (ii))
chips in front windscreen
drivers door check strap worn
exhaust deteriorating
headlamp lenses discolouring
rear tyres perishing
Both headlamp lens covers deteriorated
Both rear inner sills slightly corroded
Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement Rear bush (both sides) (2.4.G.2)
Front brake discs worn/corroded
Nearside rear tyre starting to perish
Nearside Front Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit perishing and nail in tyre (4.1.E.1)
auxiliary drive belt perishing
engine management light on
headlamp lens discoloured,ns beam pattern poor recommend attention
nsf tyre worn on outer edge
oil leak
rear exhaust joint corroding
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
headlamps discoloured
oil leak/fluid on power steering pump and feed hose
rear brake application uneven,rear brakes binding slightly
rear exhaust joint corroding
rear exhaust joint badly corroded.
slight damage front number plate.
Exhaust emissions hydrocarbon content after 2nd fast idle excessive (7.3.D.3)
engine management light on.
rear exhaust joint badly corroded.
slight damage front number plate.
Front registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
slight oil leak.
Exhaust emissions Lambda reading after 2nd fast idle outside specified limits (7.3.D.3)
Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content after 2nd fast idle excessive (7.3.D.3)
Nearside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Offside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Front registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
slight oil leak.
Nearside Headlamp aim too high (1.8)
Offside Headlamp aim too high (1.8)
nsf wiper blade split
osr tyre wearing on inner edge
rear exhaust joint corroded
stone chips front windscreen
nsf wiper blade split
osr tyre wearing on inner edge
rear exhaust joint corroded
stone chips front windscreen
Exhaust & Joints Corroding
N/S/F Tyre Only Just Legal--RECOMMEND REPLACEMENT
Nearside Headlamp aim too high and too far to the right. (1.8)
Offside Headlamp aim too high (1.8)
Exhaust & Joints Corroding
N/S/F Tyre Only Just Legal--RECOMMEND REPLACEMENT
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
front wipers worn
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
How Reliable is the Toyota RAV4?
Based on 1,827,031 MOT tests across 166,014 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
YN52 FNO is a 2002 Toyota RAV4 in Silver with a 1,998cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 32 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 62.5%.
Across all 2002 Toyota RAV4 models, the average MOT pass rate is 77.7% with a typical mileage of 81,819 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Toyota RAV4 fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 26,391 recorded failures. If you're considering buying YN52 FNO, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Toyota RAV4 typically stays on UK roads for around 32 years. At 24 years old, this Toyota RAV4 is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of YN52 FNO?
You can check the full history of YN52 FNO by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was YN52 FNO registered?
YN52 FNO is a 2002 Toyota RAV4, first registered on 8 September 2002.
Is YN52 FNO safe to buy?
The MOT history for YN52 FNO shows 32 tests with a 62.5% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does YN52 FNO have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on YN52 FNO. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.