MOT Status
ValidMileage
91,774 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Offside Front Tyre obviously under inflated (5.2.3 (l))
Rear Exhaust mounting defective Rubber split (6.1.2 (a))
Nearside Front Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Headlamp has a product on the lens so that the light output is severely reduced (4.1.4 (b))
Offside Front Headlamp has a product on the lens so that the light output is severely reduced (4.1.4 (b))
Offside Front Tyre obviously under inflated (5.2.3 (l))
Rear Exhaust mounting defective Rubber split (6.1.2 (a))
Front Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule Both (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Front Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. 27% imbalance (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Front Macpherson strut corroded but not seriously weakened Both (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement rear bush of wishbone (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened and various suspension and brake components (5.3.3 (b) (i))
engine oil leak
exhaust incorrectly adjusted, hitting car body
Front Macpherson strut corroded but not seriously weakened both very rusty (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Macpherson strut pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement top strut mountings/ securing nuts very rusty recommend replacing (5.3.4 (a) (i))
engine oil leak from sump
Front Brakes imbalanced across an axle 37% brake imbalance (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Service brake excessively fluctuating (1.2.1 (e))
Front Macpherson strut corroded but not seriously weakened both very rusty (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Macpherson strut pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement top strut mountings/ securing nuts very rusty recommend replacing (5.3.4 (a) (i))
engine oil leak from sump
engine leaking oil
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Service brake excessively fluctuating (1.2.1 (e))
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Stop lamp(s) not working (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
Rear Brake hose ferrule excessively corroded both. marked (1.1.12 (f) (i))
engine leaking oil
Nearside Rear Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Offside Rear Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Offside Upper Engine mounting corroded.
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
slight oil leak (sump plug)
Front Brake disc significantly and obviously worn (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn rear bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn rear bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Front coil spring broken (2.4.C.1a)
Front registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
How Reliable is the Nissan Note?
Based on 2,716,974 MOT tests across 180,658 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
YP59 WSF is a 2009 Nissan Note in Black with a 1,386cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 19 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 73.7%.
Across all 2009 Nissan Note models, the average MOT pass rate is 73.5% with a typical mileage of 59,175 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Nissan Note fails its MOT is coil spring broken, accounting for 38,645 recorded failures. If you're considering buying YP59 WSF, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Nissan Note typically stays on UK roads for around 20 years. At 17 years old, this Nissan Note is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of YP59 WSF?
You can check the full history of YP59 WSF by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was YP59 WSF registered?
YP59 WSF is a 2009 Nissan Note, first registered on 27 November 2009.
Is YP59 WSF safe to buy?
The MOT history for YP59 WSF shows 19 tests with a 73.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does YP59 WSF have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on YP59 WSF. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.