MOT Status
ValidMileage
122,098 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened inner face (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Oil leak, but not excessive sipping fluid from gearbox seal (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Shock absorbers has a reduced damping effect (5.3.2 (d))
Rear Sub-frame is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced and all rear suspesnion components corroded (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened bothside front inner face badly corroded (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Sub-frame is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced also suspension components and both side rear inner sill/s in place. (6.1.1 (c) (i))
gearbox seal seeping oil
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened bothside front corroded. (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Sub-frame is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced and suspension components. (6.1.1 (c) (i))
gearbox seal seeping oil.
Nearside Front Coil spring fractured or broken lower section broken. (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened bothside front corroded. (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Sub-frame is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced and suspension components. (6.1.1 (c) (i))
gearbox seal seeping oil.
Offside Front gearbox seal seeping oil.
Offside Oil leak, but not excessive gearbox seal seeping oil. (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened very poor condition should replace asap (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Headlamp lens slightly defective both side poor conditions (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Offside Oil leak, but not excessive from driveshaft seal (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened poor condition (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both side front lower arm rear bushes badly worn should replace asap (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Upper Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (5.3.4 (b) (ii))
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm 1.59mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Offside Front Tyre has ply or cords exposed (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened very poor condition should replace asap (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Headlamp lens slightly defective both side poor conditions (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Offside Oil leak, but not excessive from driveshaft seal (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened poor condition (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both side front lower arm rear bushes badly worn should replace asap (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing both side rear tyres badly cracking should replace asap (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Headlamp lens slightly defective (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement rear bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement rear bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
all brake discs corroded
Nearside Front wheel bearing rough when rotated (2.5.A.2)
Nearside Headlamp aim beam image obviously incorrect (1.8.A.1b)
Nearside Rear Shock absorber has a serious fluid leak (2.7.3)
Offside Front coil spring broken (2.4.C.1a)
Offside Headlamp aim beam image obviously incorrect (1.8.A.1b)
Offside Rear Shock absorber has a serious fluid leak (2.7.3)
Power steering pipe(s) or hose(s) leaking from a joint (2.3.3b)
all brake discs corroded
exhaust corroding
rear number plate delaminating
rear shock absorbers getting weak/o/s/r outer casing adrift
Offside Headlamp not working on dipped beam (1.7.5a)
Offside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Offside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
exhaust corroding
rear number plate delaminating
rear shock absorbers getting weak/o/s/r outer casing adrift
Offside Rear Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Offside Rear Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
headlamp beam images getting feint
Offside Front coil spring broken (2.4.C.1a)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
slight oil leak
slight oil leak from g/box
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
N/S Front tyre outer sidewall damaged.
Oil leak
How Reliable is the Ford Focus C-max?
Based on 1,326,487 MOT tests across 79,932 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
YR05 TLK is a 2005 Ford Focus C-max in Silver with a 1,596cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 24 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 75%.
Across all 2005 Ford Focus C-max models, the average MOT pass rate is 73.0% with a typical mileage of 73,496 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Ford Focus C-max fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 67,238 recorded failures. If you're considering buying YR05 TLK, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Focus C-max typically stays on UK roads for around 23 years. At 21 years old, this Ford Focus C-max is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of YR05 TLK?
You can check the full history of YR05 TLK by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was YR05 TLK registered?
YR05 TLK is a 2005 Ford Focus C-max, first registered on 28 March 2005.
Is YR05 TLK safe to buy?
The MOT history for YR05 TLK shows 24 tests with a 75% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does YR05 TLK have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on YR05 TLK. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.