MOT Status
ValidMileage
138,708 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Forward positioned bush. (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Forward positioned axle bush. (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Forward positioned bush. (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Forward positioned axle bush. (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Underbody undersealed.
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Forward positioned bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Forward positioned bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Underbody wax oiled, restricting inspection
Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Nearside and Offside, forward positioned bushes debonding. (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Inner faces. (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Nearside and Offside, forward positioned axle bushes. (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Forward positioned bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Forward positioned bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Side repeater slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
Offside Front Anti-roll bar ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Forward positioned bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Forward positioned bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Side repeater slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Front suspension arm forward positioned bushes deteriorating. Nearside and Offside
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Nearside and Offside (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Light marks to windscreen
Some corrosion to underbody, steering and suspension components
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Front And Rear (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. Front And Rear (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Upper Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
corrosion on front suspension subframe assembly
corrosion on fuel tank
rear fog lamp lense cracked
rust corrosion on underbody components
slight fluctuation on application of front brakes
some corrosion on front brake discs
Offside Front Upper Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear fog lamp damaged, but still visible from a reasonable distance taped repair (1.3.2d)
deterioration on front section of exhaust sytem flex
nearside front tyre worn close to 2mm wear bar indicators
nearside rear tyre worn to 2mm wear bar indicators
rust - corrosion on underbody components
slight deterioration on rear suspension arm rubber bushes
slight perrishing between treads on rear tyres
Nearside Stop lamp not working (1.2.1b)
Offside Front Upper Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear fog lamp damaged, but still visible from a reasonable distance taped repair (1.3.2d)
deterioration on front section of exhaust sytem flex
nearside front tyre worn close to 2mm wear bar indicators
nearside rear tyre worn to 2mm wear bar indicators
rust - corrosion on underbody components
slight deterioration on rear suspension arm rubber bushes
slight perrishing between treads on rear tyres
both front tyres close to wear limit
Nearside Headlamp not working on dipped beam (1.7.5a)
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
both rear tyres wearing on inner edges
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
both rear tyres wearing on inner edges
How Reliable is the Kia Ceed?
Based on 1,665,385 MOT tests across 147,843 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
YR59 VNF is a 2009 Kia Ceed in Black with a 1,396cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 16 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 87.5%.
Across all 2009 Kia Ceed models, the average MOT pass rate is 72.6% with a typical mileage of 66,475 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Kia Ceed fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 17,111 recorded failures. If you're considering buying YR59 VNF, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Kia Ceed typically stays on UK roads for around 19 years. At 17 years old, this Kia Ceed is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of YR59 VNF?
You can check the full history of YR59 VNF by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was YR59 VNF registered?
YR59 VNF is a 2009 Kia Ceed, first registered on 16 October 2009.
Is YR59 VNF safe to buy?
The MOT history for YR59 VNF shows 16 tests with a 87.5% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does YR59 VNF have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on YR59 VNF. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.