MOT Status
ValidMileage
117,031 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
rear subframe corroded
under body corroded
Nearside Front Tyre has a bulge, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Rear Tyre has a bulge, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
rear subframe corroded
under body corroded
all rear suspension mountings panard rod and cmponents are corroded not holed at time of test
Nearside Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened panard rod (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Front Lower Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened panard rod (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened panard rod (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Marked with chalk (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting repair covered in underseal Affected section marked with chalk (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Front Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Shock absorbers has slight external damage to the casing Lower spring mounting corrosion (5.3.2 (b))
Offside Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Marked with chalk (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Upper Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Affected section marked with chalk (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened Panhard rod affected section marked with chalk (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Exhaust fumes entering cabin (6.1.2 (b) (i))
Offside Headlamp not working on dipped beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Outer Tyre has a bulge, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure Side wall marked with chalk (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Offside Rear Anti-roll bar linkage fractured Marked with chalk (5.3.3 (b) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Offside Rear Inner Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (1.1.13 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Wear/corrosion on both inner surfaces (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Marked with chalk (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting repair covered in underseal Affected section marked with chalk (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Worn very low on inner edge also small splits and cracks developing inside tread (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Shock absorbers has slight external damage to the casing Lower spring mounting corrosion (5.3.2 (b))
Offside Rear Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Offside Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Marked with chalk (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Worn wearing low on inner edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Upper Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Affected section marked with chalk (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Wear and corrosion on both inner surfaces (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened Panhard rod affected section marked with chalk (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Rear fog lamp not working (1.3.2b)
Offside rear brake binding (3.7.B.1)
Central Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
Central Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Nearside Headlamp aim too high (1.8)
Offside Headlamp not working on dipped beam (1.7.5a)
o/s/f and o/s/r tyres worn on inside recommend replacement
Nearside Front Tyre has ply or cords exposed and cut in inner sidewall (4.1.D.1b)
Nearside Rear Suspension arm has excessive play in a pin/bush (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear Tyre has ply or cords exposed (4.1.D.1b)
Offside Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Offside Rear Suspension arm has excessive play in a pin/bush (2.4.G.2)
Rear registration plate deteriorated (6.3.1d)
o/s/f and o/s/r tyres worn on inside recommend replacement
emissions to low to register
rear number plate marked across top edge
Brakes imbalanced across an axle (3.7.B.5b)
Offside Front Headlamp not working on main beam (1.7.5a)
emissions to low to register
rear number plate marked across top edge
front tyres wearing on edges and should be replaced
How Reliable is the Jaguar Xf?
Based on 1,374,522 MOT tests across 118,872 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
YR59 XCS is a 2009 Jaguar Xf in Red with a 2,993cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 20 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 70%.
Across all 2009 Jaguar Xf models, the average MOT pass rate is 77.7% with a typical mileage of 77,876 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Jaguar Xf fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 16,779 recorded failures. If you're considering buying YR59 XCS, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Jaguar Xf typically stays on UK roads for around 18 years. At 17 years old, this Jaguar Xf is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of YR59 XCS?
You can check the full history of YR59 XCS by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was YR59 XCS registered?
YR59 XCS is a 2009 Jaguar Xf, first registered on 19 November 2009.
Is YR59 XCS safe to buy?
The MOT history for YR59 XCS shows 20 tests with a 70% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does YR59 XCS have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on YR59 XCS. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.