MOT Status
ValidMileage
99,293 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Nearside Front Side repeater slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
Nearside Side repeater lens defective which has no effect on emitted light (4.4.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Side repeater slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
Offside Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm 255/50/19 (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Side repeater lens defective which has no effect on emitted light (4.4.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Side repeater slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge 255/50/19 (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear lamp lens condensed
Offside Front tyre worn low
Offside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm tyre worn (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear lamp lens condensed
Offside Front tyre worn low
Front Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule O/s and N/s (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Front Play in steering rack inner joint(s) O/s and N/s ()
Oil leak, but not excessive engine (8.4.1 (a) (i))
underside of vehicle showing signs of light surface corrosion
Reversing lamp inoperative (4.6.1 (a))
Service brake efficiency below requirements (1.2.2 (a) (i))
Service brake excessively fluctuating (1.2.1 (e))
Nearside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened O/s and N/s (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule O/s and N/s (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Front Play in steering rack inner joint(s) O/s and N/s ()
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge 2MM (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Nail in tyre ()
Oil leak, but not excessive engine (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened O/s and N/s (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin O/s and N/s (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
underside of vehicle showing signs of light surface corrosion
Engine cover fitted and under tray fitted
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Engine cover and Under-tray cover fitted
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured both sides (4.4.3 (a))
Rear Registration plate insecure but not likely to fall off (0.1 (a))
Nearside Front Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords 255/50 R19 103V pirelli (5.2.3 (d) (i))
Engine cover and Under-tray cover fitted
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured both sides (4.4.3 (a))
Rear Registration plate insecure but not likely to fall off (0.1 (a))
Engine cover and Under-Tray cover fitted
Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Front Wipers smearing
Nearside Rear Tyre down to 3mm
Rear Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Central Rear Seat belt buckle not functioning as intended middle row (7.1.2 (d))
Engine cover and Under-Tray cover fitted
Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Front Wipers smearing
Nearside Rear Tyre down to 3mm
Rear Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear Tyre cut but not exposed
Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (1.4.A.2f)
Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
Nearside Rear Tyre cut but not exposed
Offside Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (1.4.A.2f)
under tray +engine cover fitted obscure some components
Offside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm nearside front tyres worn (4.1.E.1)
under tray +engine cover fitted obscure some components
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
engine covers fitted
under trays fitted
Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Offside Front Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (4.1.D.1a)
Nearside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Offside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
engine covers fitted
under trays fitted
How Reliable is the Volvo XC90?
Based on 1,122,947 MOT tests across 82,375 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
YR61 OAA is a 2011 Volvo XC90 in Black with a 2,400cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 20 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 60%.
Across all 2011 Volvo XC90 models, the average MOT pass rate is 75.0% with a typical mileage of 85,814 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Volvo XC90 fails its MOT is parking brake: efficiency below requirements, accounting for 23,030 recorded failures. If you're considering buying YR61 OAA, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Volvo XC90 typically stays on UK roads for around 23 years. At 15 years old, this Volvo XC90 is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of YR61 OAA?
You can check the full history of YR61 OAA by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was YR61 OAA registered?
YR61 OAA is a 2011 Volvo XC90, first registered on 5 October 2011.
Is YR61 OAA safe to buy?
The MOT history for YR61 OAA shows 20 tests with a 60% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does YR61 OAA have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on YR61 OAA. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.