MOT Status
ValidMileage
52,150 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Inner faces both sides (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened Surface corrosion on all suspension arms (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Bushes (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Outer Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated 5mm split (6.1.7 (g) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened Surface corrosion on all suspension arms (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Outer Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Clip broken (6.1.7 (g) (ii))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Inner faces both sides (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened Surface corrosion on all suspension arms (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Bushes (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Outer Position lamp with a multiple light source up to 1/2 not functioning (4.2.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Worn edges (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Worn on edges (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened Surface corrosion on all suspension arms (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively Both sides inner faces (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened Surface corrosion on all suspension components as well (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear 3rd row seat base missing at time of test
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened Surface corrosion on all suspension components as well (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Anti-lock braking system warning lamp indicates an ABS fault (1.6 (b))
Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively Both sides inner faces (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened Surface corrosion on all suspension components as well (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear 3rd row seat base missing at time of test
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened Surface corrosion on all suspension components as well (5.3.3 (b) (i))
All front and rear suspension components surface corrosion
O/S/R third row seat base missing
Anti-lock braking system warning lamp indicates an ABS fault (1.6 (b))
Headlamp aim too low Both sides, leveling arm broken off rear suspension arm (4.1.2 (a))
Nearside Rear reflector missing Incorporated into fog light (4.8.2 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
All front and rear suspension components surface corrosion
O/S/R third row seat base missing
under side of vehicle getting rusty
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
under side of vehicle getting rusty
Offside Front Inner Suspension arm attachment bracket/mounting corroded and seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Inner Brake disc in such a condition that it is seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Rear Inner Sub-frame attachment bracket/mounting likely to fail (5.3.3 (b) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Offside Front Inner Brake disc in such a condition that it is seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Offside Rear Inner Sub-frame attachment bracket/mounting likely to fail (5.3.3 (b) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Rear Seat belt has a cut which has significantly weakened the webbing 3 row seat belt cut significantly weakened webbing (5.2.2a)
Offside Rear Seat belt has a cut which has significantly weakened the webbing 3 row seat belt cut weakend the webbing (5.2.2a)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear Seat belt damaged but webbing not significantly weakened (5.2.2a)
Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Seat belt damaged but webbing not significantly weakened 3rd row (5.2.2a)
Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear Seat belt damaged but webbing not significantly weakened (5.2.2a)
Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Seat belt damaged but webbing not significantly weakened 3rd row (5.2.2a)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Nearside Rear Seat belt damaged but not affecting the operation of the belt (5.2.2a)
Offside Rear Seat belt damaged but not affecting the operation of the belt (5.2.2a)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
How Reliable is the Volvo XC90?
Based on 1,122,947 MOT tests across 82,375 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
YX59 GVC is a 2009 Volvo XC90 in Blue with a 2,400cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 21 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 66.7%.
Across all 2009 Volvo XC90 models, the average MOT pass rate is 73.6% with a typical mileage of 92,562 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Volvo XC90 fails its MOT is parking brake: efficiency below requirements, accounting for 23,030 recorded failures. If you're considering buying YX59 GVC, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Volvo XC90 typically stays on UK roads for around 23 years. At 17 years old, this Volvo XC90 is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of YX59 GVC?
You can check the full history of YX59 GVC by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was YX59 GVC registered?
YX59 GVC is a 2009 Volvo XC90, first registered on 29 September 2009.
Is YX59 GVC safe to buy?
The MOT history for YX59 GVC shows 21 tests with a 66.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does YX59 GVC have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on YX59 GVC. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.