MOT Status
ValidMileage
140,333 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Front Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Front Headlamp light source and lamp not compatible both (4.1.4 (c))
Offside Rear Outer Integral body structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear parking brake reading low on roller brake tester
Offside Rear Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced outer sill area (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive Engine sump pan leaking (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Integral body structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced outer sill corroded through (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Front Integral body structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced outer sill corroded through (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Brake lining(s) incorrectly mounted inner brake pad lining broken away from backing (1.1.13 (c)) DANGEROUS
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm inner edge (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Headlamp lens slightly defective Both lenses slightly deteriorated (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge inner edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Parking brake reading low on roller brake tester
Offside Rear Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced outer sill area corroded (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive Engine oil sump pan leaking (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive from sump (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Parking brake inoperative on one side (1.4.1 (a))
Nearside Stop lamp(s) not working (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (6.1.7 (g) (ii))
Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced all under body (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Anti-roll bar pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement BOTH (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Central Stop lamp(s) not working (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
Direction indicator incorrect colour BOTH REAR (4.4.3 (a))
Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced all under body (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Anti-roll bar pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement BOTH (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Front Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Headlamp lens slightly defective (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre bald on outer edge
Offside Front Obligatory mirror slightly damaged (3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Tyre bald on inner edge
Parking brake lever has little reserve travel (3.1.6b)
Nearside Rear Direction indicator incorrect colour flashing white (1.4.A.2f)
Offside Rear Direction indicator incorrect colour very pail (1.4.A.2f)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit 3mm (4.1.E.1)
various metal b/pipes have metal coils on .limited engine speed on smoke test
Both front brake discs corroding inner edges
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Nearside rear parking brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.6a)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
How Reliable is the Chrysler Grand Voyager?
Based on 387,238 MOT tests across 25,998 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
YY55 HWK is a 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager in Silver with a 2,776cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 24 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 70.8%.
Across all 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager models, the average MOT pass rate is 69.7% with a typical mileage of 85,434 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Chrysler Grand Voyager fails its MOT is parking brake: efficiency below requirements, accounting for 26,896 recorded failures. If you're considering buying YY55 HWK, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Chrysler Grand Voyager typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 21 years old, this Chrysler Grand Voyager is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of YY55 HWK?
You can check the full history of YY55 HWK by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was YY55 HWK registered?
YY55 HWK is a 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager, first registered on 14 November 2005.
Is YY55 HWK safe to buy?
The MOT history for YY55 HWK shows 24 tests with a 70.8% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does YY55 HWK have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on YY55 HWK. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.