MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
45,368 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement inner bushes worn both n/s o/s (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Outer both n/s o/s steering idlers worn
all brake hoses ends showing signs of corrosion
engine oil leak
engine running rich
showing signs of corrosion under vehicle body
Front Headlamp not working on main beam both n/s o/s (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Front Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid both n/s o/s (3.5 (a))
Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement inner bushes worn both n/s o/s (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Outer both n/s o/s steering idlers worn
all brake hoses ends showing signs of corrosion
engine oil leak
engine running rich
showing signs of corrosion under vehicle body
Front both n/s o/s wiper blades
Front engine oil leak
Front to rear under body showing signs corrosion
engine running rich
Nearside Outer Front Body has slight corrosion (6.1.B.2)
Oil leak
Front Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
exhaust system in poor condition
slight corrosion throughout under side of vehicle
Battery insecure (1.9.1)
Bonnet cannot be secured in the closed position (8.4.1)
Exhaust emissions hydrocarbon content excessive (7.3.B.1b)
Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
Nearside Front Front position lamp(s) obviously incorrectly positioned (1.1.A.3a)
Nearside Front Headlamp not working on dipped beam (1.7.5a)
Rear fog lamp not working (1.3.2b)
Rear fog lamp tell tale not working (1.3.1b)
Front Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
exhaust system in poor condition
slight corrosion throughout under side of vehicle
Nearside Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Nearside Rear Leaf spring deteriorated but not seriously weakened (2.4.B.1a)
Offside Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Offside Rear Leaf spring deteriorated but not seriously weakened (2.4.B.1a)
nearside and offside outer steps slightly corroded
underside of vehicle signs of rusting
Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.5b)
Brakes imbalanced across an axle (3.7.B.5b)
Nearside Front Tyre has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (4.1.D.1b)
Nearside Front Valve stem seriously damaged (4.1.D.1e)
Nearside Rear Tyre has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (4.1.D.1b)
Nearside Steering rack gaiter split (2.2.D.2d)
Nearside rear parking brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.6a)
Offside Front Tyre has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (4.1.D.1b)
Offside Rear Tyre has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (4.1.D.1b)
Offside rear brake binding (3.7.B.1)
Offside rear brake grabbing severely (3.7.A.5b)
Service brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
SEE TEST NUMBER A COPY IS ISSUED WITH THIS TEST
SLIGHT N/S/R BRAKE BIND AND ADVISE A INTERNAL INSPECTION
front brake grabbing slightly (3.7.A.2b)
rear brake grabbing slightly (3.7.A.5b)
Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Driver's seat insecure (6.2.A.1)
Exhaust has part of the system excessively deteriorated (7.1.1a)
Front passenger seat insecure (6.2.3)
Front registration plate deteriorated (6.3.1d)
Hazard warning switch faulty (1.4.B.1d)
Horn not working (1.6.2a)
Nearside Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded (5.2.6)
Nearside Track rod end ball joint has excessive play (2.2.B.1f)
Offside Front Valve stem seriously misaligned (4.1.D.1e)
front brake application uneven (3.7.B.2)
front brake grabbing severely (3.7.A.2b)
rear brake grabbing severely (3.7.A.5b)
Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrules (3.6.B.4e)
Brake hose slightly deteriorated (3.6.B.4d)
Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.5b)
Exhaust has part of the system slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
Front coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
Front wheel bearing has slight play (2.5.A.3c)
Offside Front Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.2.6)
Offside Track rod end ball joint has slight play (2.2.B.1f)
Rear Leaf spring deteriorated but not seriously weakened (2.4.B.1a)
Shock absorber has a slightly reduced damping effect (2.7.5)
Shock absorber has a slightly worn bush (2.7.4)
Shock absorber has slight corrosion to the casing (2.7.2a)
Steering column shaft slightly corroded but serviceable (2.2.C.1d)
Steering column top bearing slightly worn (2.1.2c)
Steering system has slight free play detected at steering wheel (2.2.A.1b)
Steering system slightly tight (2.2.D.1)
Vehicle structure has slight corrosion (6.1.A.1)
all ball joint boots leaking
all rear spring bushs slightly deteriorated due to age of vehicle
both seat belts slow to return
slight damage to n/s/f shocker lower mounting [bent]
front brake application uneven (3.7.B.2)
Brakes imbalanced across an axle (3.7.B.5b) DANGEROUS
front number plate is in poor condition.
general condition of vehicle is getting poor.
rear door window is insecure.
How Reliable is the Bedford Cf?
Based on 12,420 MOT tests across 1,482 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
LTT 984W is a 1981 Bedford Cf in White with a 2,279cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 15 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 66.7%.
Across all 1981 Bedford Cf models, the average MOT pass rate is 66.9% with a typical mileage of 63,757 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Bedford Cf fails its MOT is windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid, accounting for 798 recorded failures. If you're considering buying LTT 984W, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Bedford Cf typically stays on UK roads for around 56 years. At 45 years old, this Bedford Cf is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of LTT 984W?
You can check the full history of LTT 984W by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was LTT 984W registered?
LTT 984W is a 1981 Bedford Cf, first registered on 20 February 1981.
Is LTT 984W safe to buy?
The MOT history for LTT 984W shows 15 tests with a 66.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does LTT 984W have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on LTT 984W. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.